NEW YORK, April 27, 2021 /PRNewswire/ Juan Monteverde, founder and managing partner at Monteverde & Associates PC, a national securities firm rated Top 50 in the 2018-2020 ISS Securities
To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
In a decision that creates new hurdles for website accessibility lawsuits under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), on April 7, 2021, the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled that websites do not constitute places of public accommodation under Title III of the ADA. Moreover, to violate Title III an inaccessible website must create an “intangible barrier” to a disabled individual’s actual ability to access and enjoy equally the goods and services of a physical place of public accommodation.
Gil v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 17-13467 (11th Cir. April 7, 2021), takes a narrow view of the applicability of the ADA that is likely to have a significant impact on the viability of website accessibility lawsuits in the Eleventh Circuit. The decision also further highlights a split among the circuits regarding the applicability of Title III to websites and invites the United States Supreme Court to resolve
NEW YORK, April 27, 2021 /PRNewswire/ Juan Monteverde, founder and managing partner at Monteverde & Associates PC, a national securities firm ratedÂ
Top 50 in the 2018-2020 ISS Securities Class Action Services Report and headquartered at the Empire State Building in New York City, is investigating
 Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. ( FBC or the Company ) (FBC) relating to its proposed acquisition by New York Community Bancorp, Inc. Under the terms of the agreement, FBC shareholders will receive 4.0151 shares of New York Community per share they own.
The investigation focuses on whether Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. and its Board of Directors violated securities laws and/or breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by 1) failing to conduct a fair process, and 2) whether the transaction is properly valued.
A Changing Tide: Are iGaming Laws In The US Reflective Of A Global Shift? By IBT Contributor
04/28/21 AT 3:09 PM
There are perhaps few industries in the US that have undergone as profound a transformation as the iGaming sector has over the last number of years.
Much of this transformation can be put down to a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that was issued in 2018. This decision arose out of a move by the State of New Jersey to overturn the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), which had, for almost three decades, prohibited state-sanctioned sports gambling at the federal level, save for four exemptions granted to Nevada, Delaware, Oregon and Montana. The New Jersey state legislators argued that this provision violated the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which deals with the ability of states to regulate and legislate for themselves.
U.S. Supreme Court Grants Certiorari for New York State Rifle v. Corlett (Carry)
Ammoland Inc. Posted on
U.S. Supreme Court Grants Certiorari for New York State Rifle v. Corlett (Carry), IMG NRA-ILA
U.S.A. –-(AmmoLand.com)- On Monday, April 26, 2021, the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear the case of New York Rifle, Et Al. v. Corlett, for the question of whether the denial of applications for firearms carry licenses violates the Second Amendment. From the supremecourt.gov: The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.
20-843 NEW YORK STATE RIFLE, ET AL. V. CORLETT, KEITH M., ET AL.