vimarsana.com

Page 327 - ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

U S Supreme Court Set to Consider a Voter Suppression and Voter Fraud Case Brought by Single Mom Representing Herself

U S Supreme Court Set to Consider a Voter Suppression and Voter Fraud Case Brought by Single Mom Representing Herself
einnews.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from einnews.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

Democrats fight to pack Supreme Court

Democrats fight to pack Supreme Court FILE – In this Nov. 6, 2020, file photo, the Supreme Court is seen at sundown in Washington. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File) OAN Newsroom UPDATED 7:24 AM PT – Friday, April 16, 2021 Congressional Democrats introduced controversial legislation Thursday to increase the number of Supreme Court justices from nine to 13. GOP lawmakers criticized the legislation, known as the Judiciary Act of 2021, for being another push to reverse President Trump’s impact on the nation. On the contrary, Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) called the Supreme Court broken while proposing the bill after President Trump’s appointments gave the court a six to three conservative leaning.

Packing SCOTUS remains a bonehead political blunder for Democrats

Packing SCOTUS remains a ‘bonehead’ political blunder for Democrats Updated Apr 16, 2021; This is an opinion column The only reason some Democrats want to change the number of justices on the United States Supreme Court is because Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton. As a senator in 1983, Joe Biden referred to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s court-packing effort as a “bonehead idea” and “terrible mistake” that eroded the independence of the Supreme Court. It remains so today, and it’s also a political gift for Republicans. If Hillary Clinton had filled the vacancies left by Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, we wouldn’t be having the conversation about Supreme Court “reforms.” Democratic court-packers are singularly focused on delivering the judicial outcomes progressives want regardless of the cost to America.

State Court Docket Watch: State of Wisconsin v Roundtree

Amy is a legal fellow in the Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies. Felon-in-possession cases will continue to present very real and pressing questions about the parameters of Heller’s “presumptively lawful” dicta. NSA Digital Archive / Getty Images Key Takeaways In January, the Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a state statute permanently banning felons from possessing firearms. The majority concluded that Wisconsin’s statute is substantially related to the government’s important interest in addressing gun violence.[ The Wisconsin Supreme Court has now joined a growing list of courts applying intermediate scrutiny to uphold lifetime bans on gun possession for non-violent felons.

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.