Page 410 - ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

© Getty Images On March 31, just days before the NCAA Final Four weekend, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments on a matter with substantial ramifications for higher education in this country. The case asks whether antitrust laws mandate that colleges and universities, acting through the NCAA, abandon amateurism the central tenet of intercollegiate athletics since the founding of the NCAA in 1905 and instead allow each school or conference to pay student-athletes to play sports so long as the pay can be somehow tied to their education.  In other words, must higher education adopt pay for play instead of treating athletes as students, whose most important activity on campus is obtaining a college education? Very few college athletes, less than two percent in football and basketball players, go on to play professionally. Their actual campus focus is in obtaining education, training, mentoring and social interactions that are the essence of their college experience

United statesUnited states supreme courtDepartment of educationSupreme courtA supreme courtStudent athleteNational collegiate athletic associationAmateur sportsCollege athletics in the united statesNational collegiate athletic associationv alstonஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில்ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் உச்ச நீதிமன்றம்துறை ஆஃப் கல்விஉச்ச நீதிமன்றம்உச்ச நீதிமன்றம்மாணவர் தடகள