vimarsana.com

Page 522 - ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Defending liberty against political prosecution

Defending liberty against political prosecution Updated: Updated: January 22, 2021 12:17 IST Courts need to recognise selective prosecution as a threshold constitutional defence against the abuse of state power Share Article AAA Courts need to recognise selective prosecution as a threshold constitutional defence against the abuse of state power One of the oldest, most pernicious and widespread forms of abuse of state power in India involves the police and enforcement agencies selectively targeting political and ideological opponents of the ruling dispensation to interrogate, humiliate, harass, arrest, torture and imprison them, ostensibly on grounds unrelated to their ideology or politics, while sparing comparably placed supporters and friends of rulers of the day.

Building Relationships with Tribes and Operating on Reservation Lands: Lessons From FMC v Shoshone | K&L Gates LLP

Building Relationships with Tribes and Operating on Reservation Lands: Lessons From FMC v. Shoshone On 11 January 2021, the United States Supreme Court declined a petition to review the Ninth Circuit’s decision in FMC Corporation v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes. In that case, the Ninth Circuit upheld a tribal court decision requiring FMC Corporation (FMC), a non-Indian business, to pay a tribally-assessed annual permit fee of US$1.5 million to store hazardous wastes from FMC’s phosphorous plant operations on the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes (Tribes) Fort Hall Reservation (Reservation). Given that companies are increasingly engaging with Native American tribes on long-term relationships to develop and operate wind, solar, agriculture, retail, and other projects on tribal lands, the Ninth Circuit’s decision provides a unique and timely opportunity to see how tribal jurisdiction can play out in the context of non-Indian companies conducting business on reservation lands.

Judges should not have agendas - Attorney General

Share: Colombo (News 1st); Judges cannot use the judicial platform to satisfy 3rd party and personal interest and have agendas and should at all times avoid possible conflicts of interest, said Attorney General Dappula De Livera on Thursday (21). He was speaking at the Ceremonial Sitting to welcome Justice Janak De Silva, Justice Achala Wengappuli, and Justice Mahinda Samayawardhena to the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka. The backlog of cases in Sri Lanka is a perennial problem and it has to be addressed urgently and quickly, methodically and efficiently and to deliver speedy justice and prevent Law delays without compromising the quality of justice, he said.

45th President of the United States, Donald J Trump Farewell Speech • Paso Robles Press

SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Monteverde & Associates PC Announces an Investigation of Oxford Immunotec Global PLC

Share this article Share this article NEW YORK, Jan. 20, 2021 /PRNewswire/ Juan Monteverde, founder and managing partner at Monteverde & Associates PC, a national securities firm rated  Top 50 in the 2018 and 2019 ISS Securities Class Action Services Report and headquartered at the Empire State Building in New York City, is investigating  Oxford Immunotec Global PLC ( OXFD or the Company ) ( ) relating to its proposed sale to PerkinElmer, Inc. Under the terms of the agreement, OXFD shareholders will receive $22.00 in cash per share they own. The investigation focuses on whether Oxford Immunotec Global PLC and its Board of Directors violated securities laws and/or breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by 1) failing to conduct a fair process, and 2) whether and by how much this proposed transaction undervalues the Company.

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.