Survey Fax Neither Unsolicited Advertisement nor Pretext Thursday, April 8, 2021
Does a “faxed invitation to participate in a market research survey in exchange for money constitute an ‘advertisement’ [or the pretext of one] under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act…and [its] implementing regulations…[?]” In a case of first impression in the courts of the Second Circuit, Judge Paul A. Crotty says “NO.”
In
Bruce E. Katz, M.D., P.C. d/b/a Juva Skin and Laser Center v. Focus Forward LLC, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66861, Case No. 20-cv-2897 (PAC), United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, April 6, 2021, the plaintiff professional corporation received two faxes from the defendant, a firm that “conducts market research through surveys to collect information for its clients.” The faxes sought “participants for market studies” and invited the “recipients to share their opinions with Defendant in exchange for a $150 ‘honorar
Share:
NEW YORK, April 08, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) Bernstein Liebhard, a nationally acclaimed investor rights law firm, announces that a securities class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of investors who purchased or acquired the securities of Canoo Inc., ( Canoo or the Company ) (NASDAQ:GOEV) from August 18, 2020 through March 29, 2021 (the Class Period ). The lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California alleges violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
If you
purchased Canoo securities, and/or would like to discuss your legal rights and options please visit Canoo Shareholder Class Action Lawsuit or contact Matthew E. Guarnero toll free at
Case activity for Jimy Boyd vs Dr Shah on April 6 madisonrecord.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from madisonrecord.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
On the heels of CFPB Acting Director Dave Uejio’s recently released statement to agency staff members, the Bureau again signaled that it is making progress toward issuing a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) enacting Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act). Specifically, in late February, the CFPB filed its fourth status report in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California as part of a legal settlement. This latest status report indicates that the Bureau is moving closer towards issuing to enact these important regulations.