Page 20 - கலிஃபோர்னியா உயர்ந்தது நீதிமன்றம் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Lawsuit accuses McDonald s of discriminating against Black-owned media companies

Lawsuit accuses McDonald s of discriminating against Black-owned media companies Celine Castronuovo © Getty Lawsuit accuses McDonald s of discriminating against Black-owned media companies A lawsuit filed Thursday against McDonald s alleges that the fast-food giant has discriminated against Black-owned media companies in its allocation of advertising spending. The legal complaint, which was filed in California Superior Court by Entertainment Studios Networks Inc. and Weather Group LLC, argues that out of McDonald s $1.6 billion in U.S. television advertising in 2019, less than $5 million, or roughly 0.31 percent, was spent on Black-owned media. The entertainment companies, both of which are owned by media mogul Byron Allen, who is Black, note in the lawsuit that this small portion of spending comes despite the fact that African Americans represent about 40 percent of fast food customers.

United statesByron allenWeather groupCalifornia superior courtEntertainment studios networks incGetty lawsuitEntertainment studios networksAfrican americanAfrican american ownedEntertainment studiosAfrican americaWeather channelஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில்பைரன் ஆலன்வானிலை குழுகலிஃபோர்னியா உயர்ந்தது நீதிமன்றம்

Lawsuit accuses McDonald s of discriminating against Black-owned media companies

Lawsuit accuses McDonald s of discriminating against Black-owned media companies
thehill.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from thehill.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

United statesByron allenWeather groupCalifornia superior courtEntertainment studios networks incEntertainment studios networksAfrican americansAfrican american ownedEntertainment studiosAfrican americanAfrican americaWeather channelஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில்பைரன் ஆலன்வானிலை குழுகலிஃபோர்னியா உயர்ந்தது நீதிமன்றம்

Robert Durst Judge Denies Defense Attempt to Stall Trial over Cancer Diagnosis

Robert Durst Judge Denies Defense Attempt to Stall Trial over Cancer Diagnosis Alberto Luperon © Provided by Law & Crime LOS ANGELES, CA - MARCH 10: Real estate heir Robert Durst, center, sits with his co-defense attorney David Chesnoff during his murder trial on March 10, 2020 in Los Angeles, California. Millionaire Robert Durst is accused of murdering his friend and long-time confidante Susan Berman in 2000. Prosecutors have built their case around evidence from the HBO documentary Robert Durst is seen in a March 10, 2020 courtroom photo. His attorneys have said his condition deteriorated since then. The judge in the murder trial of Robert Durst, 78, denied a defense motion to stall the case over the defendant’s cancer diagnosis. In rejecting the attempt, California Superior Court Judge

United statesRobert durstLos angelesDavid chesnoffSusan bermanCathy russonJohn lewinMark windhamCalifornia superior courtMillionaire robert durstCalifornia superior court judge mark windhamJudge windhamDistrict attorney john lewinRobert durst judge denies defense attemptStall trialCancer diagnosis

COVID-19 Business Interruption Insurance: Better Odds for Policy Holders?

Friday, May 14, 2021 It’s been a year since COVID-19 caused a torrent of insurance coverage litigation regarding business interruption and extra expense coverage for losses due to governmental orders, shut down requirements, and the spread of the coronavirus. With more than 335 decisions having been issued as of early May 2021, the numbers show significantly better odds for policyholders than the insurance industry and many media reports suggest. ‘So you’re saying that there’s a chance!’ There are more than 50 decisions in which courts have either granted summary judgment to policyholders or denied insurance companies’ motions to dismiss in the context of business interruption and extra expense insurance claims resulting from the pandemic.

United statesNorth carolinaSparta insurance companyWashington superior courtSummit corpFrancois incUnited states district courtUs district courtOhio courtWisconsin circuit courtDino palmieri salons incCalifornia superior courtPennsylvania courtChapparells incMama jo incCarolina superior court

PG&E Fights Criminal Charges Over 2019 California Wildfire

PG&E Fights Criminal Charges Over 2019 California Wildfire By Joel Rosenblatt and Mark Chediak | May 13, 2021 Utility giant PG&E Corp. rejected criminal liability for its role in a 2019 wildfire that burned 78,000 acres in Northern California, arguing that a local prosecutor is twisting state law in an attempt to find the company culpable. Sonoma County District Attorney Jill Ravitch last month charged PG&E with with 33 counts stemming from the Kincade Fire. In a state court filing Tuesday, the utility said it has accepted regulators’ conclusions that the fire was caused by PG&E’s equipment but will contest the 25 counts that have never been applied to a wildfire.

Shasta countyUnited statesSonoma countySan brunoJill ravitchPatriciak poppePge corpCalifornia superior courtNorthern californiaCounty district attorney jill ravitchZogg fireChief executive officer patriciaKincade fireSanta rosaசாஸ்தா கவுண்டிஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில்