tanmayFebruary 17, 2021 23
The global Ultra HD Action Camera Market report includes an overview, which interprets value chain structure, industrial environment, regional analysis, applications, types market size, and forecast. The report is integrated with imperative insights on the market which will support the clients to make precise business decisions. The report incorporates data regarding the supply and demand situation, the competitive scenario, and the challenges for market growth, market opportunities, and the threats encountered by key players during the forecast period of 2021-2025. This is the latest report, covering the current COVID-19 impact on the market. The pandemic of Coronavirus (COVID-19) has affected every aspect of life globally.
On February 4, 2021, ALJ Dee Lord issued a notice of initial determination
( ID ) in
Certain Wearable Monitoring Devices,
Systems, and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-1190).
According to the notice, the ALJ found no violation of section
337.
By way of background, this investigation was based on a January
15, 2020 complaint filed by Philips North America, LLC and
Koninklijke Philips N.V. alleging violations of section 337 by
Respondents Fitbit, Inc., Garmin International, Inc. and Garmin 2
USA, Inc., Garmin Ltd. d/b/a Garmin Switzerland GmbH, Ingram Micro
Inc., Maintek Computer (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., and Inventec Appliances
(Pudong) through the importation and/or sale of certain wearable
Press release content from Business Wire. The AP news staff was not involved in its creation.
Garmin prevails in Philips patent dispute
February 5, 2021 GMT
OLATHE, Kan. (BUSINESS WIRE) Feb 5, 2021
Garmin® International, Inc., a unit of Garmin Ltd. (NASDAQ: GRMN), today announced total victory in a trade lawsuit brought by Philips North America, LLC and Koninklijke Philips NV against Garmin. An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) at the International Trade Commission (ITC) issued an initial determination on Feb. 4, 2021, finding that Philips’ asserted patents were invalid and did not cover Garmin’s popular wearable devices.
“Garmin is very pleased with the ALJ’s initial determination and conclusion that Philips’ patents are invalid and not infringed by Garmin’s products,” said Andrew Etkind, Garmin’s vice president and General Counsel. “This result was abundantly clear from the start. Garmin has repeatedly taken a stand against meritless patent lawsuits, and it is