“Arizona continues to struggle with a public health and economic crisis. Kyrsten is working to ensure a next relief bill is laser-focused on addressing those immediate needs to save lives and fuel a full economic recovery, the statement reads. On this amendment, Kyrsten voted to uphold what is currently law, which does not allow individuals without work-eligible social security numbers to receive stimulus payments. Kyrsten has voted to support, and this amendment does not deny, aid to mixed status families.”
Senator Kelly, who took office on December 2 after beating Republican Martha McSally in the general election, responded to a message after publication of this article on Tuesday:
Democratic U.S. Senator Ben Cardin and Republican Senator Todd Young will introduce a resolution on Thursday urging Myanmar's military to step back from this week's coup, Cardin told Reuters, backing up the Biden administration's pressure for the release of Myanmar's leader.
By Reuters Staff
2 Min Read
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democratic U.S. Senator Ben Cardin and Republican Senator Todd Young will introduce a resolution on Thursday urging Myanmar’s military to step back from this week’s coup, Cardin told Reuters, backing up the Biden administration’s pressure for the release of Myanmar’s leader, Aung San Suu Kyi.
Slideshow ( 2 images )
“They have to make a choice,” Cardin said, explaining that the purpose of the resolution is to show there will be consequences for the seizure of power.
“We have tools in place that can be used,” Cardin said. Those could include reinstating sanctions lifted after Myanmar moved toward democracy or instituting targeted sanctions against military leaders involved in the coup, he added.
To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
In 2016, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued Joint Guidance for Human Resource Professionals warning that no-poach agreements restricting employee hiring may violate the antitrust laws.[1] That guidance, along with pre-guidance litigation, has established some clear ground rules. Naked no-poach agreements are per se illegal under §1 of the Sherman Act,[2] while ancillary no-poach agreements, those related to legitimate, procompetitive joint ventures[3] and corporate acquisitions,[4] are subject to the rule of reason, which considers whether the agreement is, on balance, anticompetitive.
Yet, four years later, there remain stubborn pockets of disagreement for example, no-poach clauses in franchise agreements. Federal courts are struggling to reach a consensus on how to analyze them under the antitrust laws. And there’s a lot at stake. Statistics show more than 8 million American