Page 11 - குயின்ஸ்டவுன் ஏரிகள் மாவட்டம் சபை News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

The neighbours also took issue with screening vegetation which was removed during construction. The council pointed out the application proposed removal of about 640 square metres of kanuka and, following construction, would provide 428 square metres of structural planting. Justice Dunningham ruled in favour of the neighbours. The neighbours also took issue with the height of the building, however the justice determined the council did not ignore its effects, and consequently did not uphold the ground of review. There was also contention about a removed consent notice, that would have mandated the building be screened from the shoreline. Justice Dunningham found the limited notification was made on the wrong legal basis, being that effects of vegetation removal were minor when they should have been less than minor.

New zealand generalNew zealandJennifer munnsWilliam brownPaula clarkeJustice dunninghamJustice rachel dunninghamQueenstown lakes district councilGoldsmith fox trusteesBriar bank drHigh courtMurray frostFox trusteesRachel dunninghamபுதியது ஜீலாந்துவில்லியம் பழுப்பு