vimarsana.com

Page 56 - குற்றவாளி பாதுகாப்பு வழக்கறிஞர்கள் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Quotation of the Day: U S Slow to Shield Its Inmates From Virus

Supreme Court Weighs Expansion to Warrantless Entry

What Normally Allows a Police Officer to Enter and Search Your Home The Fourth Amendment requires that police officers have a warrant to enter and search a home. The goal of this provision is to protect privacy and offer freedom from unreasonable intrusions by the government.  Generally, there are a few exceptions. Warrantless searches are permitted when a person gives consent to a home search. It can happen if a police officer already has the right to be on the person’s property and sees evidence of a crime. Police also have the authority to search and seize evidence if they are conducting a valid arrest in a person’s home. Another exception is the “emergency aid” case, when an officer sees a resident collapsing for apparent medical reasons from the window and can run into the house to administer aid.

COVID vaccine for jail: NJ moves to vaccinate inmates, ICE detainees

NorthJersey.com Months after the coronavirus surged through the state s prison population, county jails in North Jersey are off to a slow start inoculating thousands of inmates and immigration detainees as supplies of the vaccine remain limited.  Officials in Bergen, Passaic and Morris counties this week said they re still in the planning stages of inoculations. The Essex and Hudson county jails have administered shots to eligible members of their populations, though so far they have reached only a fraction of their inmates and staffs. We have been very proactive, and we think it s important,  Phil Alagia, the chief of staff for Essex County Executive Joseph DiVencenzo, said last week. It keeps our officers safe, and the people that get released ultimately go back to the community.  

A push is on in the Utah Legislature to repeal bail reforms aimed at ending the state s pay-to-get-out-of-jail system

| Updated: 9:01 p.m. Last legislative session, Rep. Stephanie Pitcher wrangled together groups from across the criminal justice system to solve what she sees as a longstanding flaw in the way Utah treats defendants before trial, when their guilt or innocence hasn’t yet been established in court. Her problem was this: Why should relatively low-risk defendants sit behind bars for weeks or months awaiting trial because they’re poor, while rich people can simply post bail and walk free? It’s a question that has prompted a bail reform movement across the nation in recent years, but also one that has bedeviled states given the high stakes involved, with some debates pitting public safety versus personal liberty. So it astonished some last year when Pitcher, a Salt Lake City Democrat whose full-time job is as a prosecutor, managed to assemble a broadly supported reform package and to win approval from the Republican-dominated Legislature.

Washington court strikes down law that made unintentional possession of drugs a crime

© iStock The Washington Supreme Court this week struck down a law that made it a felony to unknowingly possess illegal drugs in the state. A majority of justices ruled Thursday that the strict liability drug possession law, which made any illegal drug possession a felony, was unconstitutional. “The court correctly recognized the injustice of convicting people for innocent conduct,” Richard Lechich, who argued the case before the court, told The Seattle Times. “While the decision cannot rectify the harm this law caused to so many communities, particularly communities of color, it at least puts an end to it.” ADVERTISEMENT The state initially adopted the strict liability law in the 1950s and upheld it as simple possession in two instances since then. On Thursday, the justices decided that a felony conviction in a case where a person may have obtained drugs through “innocent, passive conduct was a harsh penalty.

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.