Tuesday, May 25: How to build a better grid
In each instance, lawmakers left
the state’s lightly regulated energy markets alone, choosing cheap electricity over a more stable system. As a result, experts say, the power grid that Texans depend on to heat and cool their homes and run their businesses has become less and less reliable and more susceptible to weather-related emergencies.
“Everyone has been in denial,” said Alison Silverstein, a consultant who works with the U.S. Department of Energy and formerly served as a senior adviser at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. “They treat each individual extreme event as a one-off, a high-impact, low-frequency event, which means, ‘I hope it doesn’t happen again.’”
It looks like this was the result of either:
A mistyped address
A broken link on our site
A broken link on a search engine results page
A broken link on someone else s page
Some things to try:
Use the navigation menu at the top Most Read
Deep Dive Elliott s proposed Duke split untimely, analysts say, as advocates warn of dangerous can of worms
Analysts question why the proposal to split Duke Energy into three companies comes now, when the utility is on an upswing, while ratepayer advocates warn against Elliott Management s outsized role. Published May 20, 2021 Kena Betancur via Getty Images
A proposal to break up Duke Energy into three separate companies has analysts scratching their heads, and ratepayer advocates on the fence about its merits.
Elliott Management, a top 10 Duke shareholder, on Monday sent a letter to the utility, proposing it split its territories into three separate companies in order to maximize shareholder value, with what Elliott says is the potential to unlock up to $15 billion. Given Duke s share price underperformance over the past decade, and lagging rate base growth relative to its peers, the investor say
Legal Disclaimer
You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review s (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.
NESE pipeline developer receives two-year extension centraljersey.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from centraljersey.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.