vimarsana.com

Page 61 - கூட்டாட்சியின் கையகப்படுத்தல் ஒழுங்குமுறை News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

What Does the Internet Of Things (IoT) Cybersecurity Improvement Act Mean For Government Contractors? | Husch Blackwell LLP

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: On December 4, 2020 the President signed into law the IoT Cybersecurity Improvement Act of 2020, Pub. L. No. 116-207 (the “IoT Act”). The legislative purpose behind the new law is to ensure the highest level of cybersecurity at federal agencies by working collaboratively within government, industry and academia. Pub. L. No. 116-207 § 2. The IoT Act mandates specific actions by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) regarding: (i) standards and guidelines for IoT devices, (ii) determining whether federal agencies adhere to those standards, (iii)implementing guidelines to disclose security vulnerabilities to contractors and report the resolution of those vulnerabilities.

Bureau of DRL: 2020 Supporting Human Rights Defenders in Libya

Bureau of DRL: 2020 Supporting Human Rights Defenders in Libya 150SHARES The U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (DRL) has announced an open competition for organizations interested in submitting applications for projects that support protections for civil society, human rights defenders, and journalists so that they can operate freely. All programs should aim to have an impact that leads to reforms and should have the potential for sustainability beyond DRL resources. DRL’s preference is to avoid duplicating past efforts by supporting new and creative approaches. This does not exclude from consideration projects that improve upon or expand existing successful projects in a new and complementary way.

COFC Confirms Rule of Two Analysis Applies Before Agency Decides to Utilize a Multiple-Award Vehicle | PilieroMazza PLLC

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: On November 30, 2020, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (COFC) issued a decision that supported the Small Business Administration’s position regarding the Rule of Two analysis requirements for government acquisitions.[1] The central question surrounding the case was whether the U.S. Army could cancel a Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 8 service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB) set-aside procurement under the General Services Administration’s Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) and move the requirement to a multiple-award indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (MAIDIQ) contract vehicle that the plaintiff, The Tolliver Group, Inc. (Tolliver), did not hold. In its protest, Tolliver argued, in part, that the Army’s actions violated the Rule of Two because the agency was required to determine whether two or more small businesses were capable of performing the requirement prior to choosing to put the proc

Contract Briefs | Aerotech News & Review

U.S. Air Force Lockheed Martin Corp., Fort Worth, Texas, has been awarded a ceiling $900,000,000 firm-fixed-price, time-and-materials, over-and-above, cost-reimbursement contract to stand up a continental U.S.-based contractor facility to perform depot-level maintenance and aircraft modification services in support of the F-16 aircraft.  Support will include all aircraft modifications, unplanned drop-in maintenance, time compliance technical orders, scheduled inspections and contract field team support.  This award is the result of a competitive acquisition and four offers were received.  Fiscal 2021 operation and maintenance funds in the amount of $1,402,952 are being obligated at the time of award.  The Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, Hill Air Force Base, Utah, is the contracting activity (FA8232-21-D-0005).

Contractors Should Not Leave Money on the Table: The Federal Circuit Clears the Way for Boeing to Use the Tucker Act to Sue DoD for Illegal Exaction in Connection with Contract Costs

USA December 14 2020 In these unprecedented, economically-challenging times for the aviation industry, it is especially important that airlines, manufacturers and other industry stakeholders have an accessible avenue open to them for pursuing reimbursement claims against the federal government arising out of government contracts. In a decision handed down last August, Boeing Co. managed to reverse its fortunes and resuscitate a claim under the federal Tucker Act to recover costs incurred in performing a Department of Defense (“DoD”) contract. Boeing did so by styling its claim as one to recover an “illegal exaction.” In so doing, Boeing avoided its failure to have raised its claim with the agency.

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.