U.S. District Court Judge William S. Stickman IV | Wikipedia
PITTSBURGH – Litigation from a pair of brothers from Western Pennsylvania and their dairy farm, which lodged formal action over a dispute concerning a loan process the farm was involved in and a subsequent sheriff’s sale on their property, is headed back to an Indiana County court.
David E. Kimmel of Plumville and Michael T. Kimmel and Kimmel Brothers Farms, LLC of Home initially filed suit in the Indiana County Court of Common Pleas on May 18, versus Elderton State Bank and Ray Sleppy of Elderton, Farm Service Agency of Washington, D.C., David Poorbaugh of Harrisburg and Charles Glasser of Indiana, Pa.
The U.S. Supreme Court. (Courthouse News photo/Jack Rodgers)
WASHINGTON (CN) The Supreme Court gutted a lawsuit Thursday from a 21-year-old college student arrested for resisting arrest in a case of mistaken identity.
Writing for the unanimous court, Justice Clarence Thomas ruled that James King became barred from pursuing any other claims against his arresting officers once the District Court ruled against his bid for damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
The law includes a provision known as the judgment bar that says judgment in the action precludes further action against government agents whose actions “gave rise to the claim.”
Supreme Court Tosses Suit Brought by Michigan Man Beaten by Police in Case of Mistaken Identity theepochtimes.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from theepochtimes.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Health
your username
January 27, 2021 On Tuesday, a decision was issued in the case brought by a doctor against the United States. The opinion, rendered by the Second Circuit, resolves a question regarding whether the plaintiff’s actions received immunity under the Federally Supported Health Centers Assistance Act. The case also dealt with the notice requirements involved with the removal of a case to federal court.
According to the opinion, Dr. Razmzan was employed as a doctor in a Federally Supported Health Center in New York. As a part of his employment contract, Dr. Razmzan was required to not bill any services that he performed at the clinic in lieu of a direct salary. However, he was required and permitted to bill any inpatient services that he provided for the clinic’s patients in lieu of a higher salary. After being sued for malpractice involving an inpatient treatment, Dr. Razmzan removed the case to federal court and sought to dismiss the case under the Federal Tor
Benjamin G. Greenberg White Collar Defense Attorney Greenberg Traurig Miami, FL focusing on White collar, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, Health care fraud, Government investigations, False Claims Act, Money laundering, and National security.