To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
AMG Capital Management, LLC v. FTC, No. 19-508: Petitioner Scott Tucker controlled a number of companies offering short-term payday loans. The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) brought suit, claiming that Tucker and his companies were violating the Federal Trade Commission Act by engaging in “unfair or deceptive acts or practices” – namely, that the companies’ explanation of its loan terms to customers were misleading compared to the fine print the companies enforced. The FTC sought a permanent injunction, as well as restitution and disgorgement, relying upon §13(b) of the Act, which authorizes the FTC to obtain a “permanent injunction” against “any person, partnership, or corporation” that “is violating or is about to violate, any provision of law” that the FTC enforces. The District Court found for the FTC, granting both an injunction and ordering $1.27 billion in restitution and disgorgement. Th
U S Supreme Court curbs FTC s power to recoup ill-gotten gains - Netscape Money & Business
netscape.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from netscape.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Supreme Court cuts back FTC power to seek ill-gotten gains
djournal.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from djournal.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.