ВИДЕО: Оюутолгойн гэрээг сайжруул гэсэн ард түмнийхээ шаардлагыг УИХ дэмжиж байгаа shuud.mn - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from shuud.mn Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
On January 12, 2021, the Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) settled its first civil action for alleged fraud against the Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP”) – the primary lending program under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act for small businesses negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Prosecutors in the Eastern District of California brought civil claims under the False Claims Act (the “FCA”) and the Financial Institution Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (“FIRREA”) against a company and its CEO, alleging that they falsely claimed that the company was not in bankruptcy in order to qualify for a PPP loan. The FCA creates civil liability for a person who knowingly (including recklessly or with deliberate ignorance) defrauds a federally funded program by submitting false claims for money.[1] FIRREA allows the government to impose civil penalties for violation
In November, Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr (left) became the chair of the Republican Attorneys General Association, while Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall (right) became RAGA s policy chair and chair of the group s Rule of Law Defense Fund, which was among the sponsors of the Trump rally preceding the U.S. Capitol Riot and sent out robocalls urging people to march to the Capitol to stop the steal. (Official portraits.)
After its nonprofit subsidiary promoted lies about election fraud and made a robocall ahead of the Capitol riot urging Trump supporters to march there to stop the steal, the Republican Attorneys General Association (RAGA) a political spending group that promotes the election of GOP state AGs is under fire for its role in the campaign to block certification of the presidential election.
What will be the future of China’s authoritarian political system?
Many predicted that China’s rapid development over the past several decades would inevitably lead to gradual liberalization. Economic growth was expected to generate a cascade of changes first to society, then law, and eventually politics. Events appeared to confirm these projections. As Chinese authorities opened up the economy in the late twentieth century, they also launched sweeping reforms of the nation’s legislative and judicial institutions.
The events of the past decade, however, have called these assumptions into question. From 2000 to 2011, per capita GDP in China more than quintupled, skyrocketing from US$949 to $5,445. But one-party rule remains intact under the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and Chinese authorities have turned against many of the legal reforms that they themselves enacted back in the 1980s and 1990s. Lawyers have come under increased pressure. Political campaigns warning against r