vimarsana.com

Page 13 - சிவில் சுதந்திரங்கள் தொழிற்சங்கம் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Supreme Court weighs student s Snapchat profanity case | News, Sports, Jobs

Apr 29, 2021 WASHINGTON (AP) A wary Supreme Court on Wednesday weighed whether public schools can discipline students for things they say off campus, worrying about overly restricting speech on the one hand and leaving educators powerless to deal with bullying on the other. The justices, hearing arguments in the case of a 14-year-old high school freshman’s Snapchat F-bombs, struggled to fit the need to protect students’ political and religious expression with the ability of schools to get at disruptive, even potentially dangerous, speech that occurs outside the school setting. In one of many examples members of the court offered, Justice Elena Kagan described boys who keep a sexually charged online ranking of girls based on their looks. “You can’t put people in jail for commenting on people’s appearance, but shouldn’t a school be able to deal with it?” Kagan asked.

Supreme Court weighs student s Snapchat profanity case – Times News Online

Supreme Court weighs student s Snapchat profanity case – Times News Online
tnonline.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from tnonline.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

Can a school suspend a student from cheerleading because of a Snapchat rant?

Can a school suspend a student from cheerleading because of a Snapchat rant? Jeff Parrott © Photo Illustration by Alex Cochran The Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday on whether public school can punish students for things students’ say while off school grounds or if that speech should be protected by the First Amendment. The case involves a 14-year-old freshman girl who was suspended from participating on a Pennsylvania high school cheerleading squad for a year after she posted a profanity-laced video to social media. The teen shared the rant on Snapchat a video sharing app where posts are meant to be temporary during a weekend in 2017 after, as a freshman, she was passed up for the varsity squad, ABC News reported.

European Parliament confirms new online censorship powers — EUbusiness com

Info 29 April 2021 by eub2 last modified 29 April 2021 EU regulation against terrorist content online (TERREG) was approved without a final vote by the European Parliament on April 29th. The regulation will harm our ability to freely express ourselves and access information online.  Advertisement On 29 April, the Regulation on addressing the dissemination of terrorist content online was approved without a final vote, concluding the last step of the European Union legislative process before the measures it contains can come into effect. The procedure for the second reading excluded elected representatives from the final decision over this human rights intrusive legislation. It deprived EU citizens from seeing if the Members of the European Parliament, the only democratically elected body of the EU would have accepted a 1-hour removal deadline for content, forcing platforms to use content filtering, and empowering state authorities to enable censorship.

Wary Supreme Court weighs student s Snapchat profanity case - Casper, WY Oil City News

Wary Supreme Court weighs student s Snapchat profanity case - Casper, WY Oil City News
oilcity.news - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from oilcity.news Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.