Page 2 - சுதந்திரம் க்கு ரெட் அடித்தளம் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Throughout our nation’s history most potently since the era of civil rights activism those participating in social movements challenging the status quo have enjoyed First Amendment protections to freely associate with others in advocating for causes they believe in. This right is directly tied to our ability to maintain privacy over what organizations we choose to join or support financially. Forcing organizations to hand membership or donor lists to the state threatens First Amendment activities and suppresses dissent, as those named, facing harassment or worse, have to decide between staying safe or speaking out. In a California case over donor disclosures, we’ve urged the Supreme Court to apply this important principle to ensure that the bar for public officials seeking information about people’s political and civic activities is sufficiently high. In an amicus brief filed last week, EFF, along with four other free speech advocacy groups, asked the court to compel the Calif

United statesPeople united for privacy foundationFreedom to read foundationSupreme courtNational coalition against censorshipProsperity foundationWoodhull freedom foundationUs courtFirst amendmentCalifornia attorney generalNinth circuitAmericans for prosperity foundationRead foundationPeople unitedPrivacy foundationAttorney general