Warden Brookhart: Notice From Clerk Instructing Plaintiff To File Notice And Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant To Administrative Order No. 257, Within 21 Days Of This Notice, You Must File The Attached Form Indicating Your Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Or An Affirmative Declination To Consent. Consent/non-consent To U.s. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form Sent To Plaintiff On 2/1/2021. Consent Due By 2/22/2021 (jaj) Notice And Order: The Court Has Received Your Complaint And Your Motion To Proceed Without Prepayment Of The Filing Fee. Your Case Number Is 21-110-spm. The Following Is Some Information You Should Know Regarding The Initial Stages Of Your Lawsuit. After Your Filing Fee Status Is Determined, The Court Will Review Your Complaint To Identify Legally Sufficient Claims And Defendants And Dismiss Any Legally Insufficient Claims. See: 28 U.s.c. Sec. 1915a. The Court Will Conduct This Review Within The Next 60 Days And I
Port authority set to move forward in 2021; reports 26 applications for CARES Grant funds
Submitted article
WILMINGTON The Clinton County Port Authority Board at its December meeting approved agreements with three vendors to provide services for 2021.
DigiCom Systems, LLC, provides and maintains the access control and surveillance systems for the Wilmington Air Park. The annual agreement covers software upgrades, hardware maintenance and replacement, as well as technical support.
“These systems are essentially ‘ground zero’ for the security systems throughout the Air Park,” said Dan Evers, Executive Director for the Clinton County Port Authority.
Agreements with Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc., (JLL), and Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease, LLP, also were approved by the board.
Pixabay
EDWARDSVILLE A former Jones Lang Lasalle Americas employee claims he was discriminated against because of his age and then fired in retaliation.
Mark Petkus filed a complaint Dec. 11 in the Madison County Circuit Court against Jones Lang Lasalle Americas Inc., and Sean Coser, alleging violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and Intentional Interference of Economic Advantage.
According to the complaint, Petkus claims he was working at a facility in Madison County that was managed by Jones Lang Lasalle when he was 56 years old. He alleges he was treated differently than younger employees and suffered from a hostile work environment and harassment due to his age.
5 Key Bid Protest Decisions Of 2020
USA December 23 2020
In 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, and the U.S. Government Accountability Office issued five decisions worthy of particular note:
Inserso Corp. v. U.S.[1]
Teledyne Brown Engineering Inc.[2]
Kiewit Infrastructure West Co. v. U.S.[3]
LAX Electronics Inc. v. U.S.[4]
Centerra Integrated Facilities Services LLC.[5]
This article provides a brief overview of these five cases and discusses how they might shape the bid protest landscape going forward.[6]
Inserso
The Facts
In March 2016, the Defense Information Systems Agency posted the Encore III solicitation for indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contracts for IT services. The competition was divided into two suites: one for full and open competition and the other restricted to small businesses.