vimarsana.com

Page 3 - திவால்நிலை மேல்முறையீடு குழு News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Bankruptcy – Equitable mootness – Reorganization plan

Privacy Overview This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience. Necessary

Another Bankruptcy Court Weighs in on Postpetition Interest | Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: Cuker Interactive, LLC filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition on December 13, 2018, in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California.  Because it was solvent at confirmation, the debtor proposed to pay secured creditors in full, with interest at the contract rate, and general unsecured creditors in full, with postpetition interest at the “legal rate,” or a rate determined by the Court that leaves the creditors unimpaired.[1]   But what rate is that? Section 1124(1) provides that where a Chapter 11 plan, and not the Bankruptcy Code, “impairs” a claim or interest, the impaired class is entitled to vote on the plan unless it “leaves unaltered the legal, equitable, and contractual rights” of the holders.[2]  In this case, unsecured creditors argued that they were “impaired” because the plan did not require the debtor to pay postpetition interest at the contractual rate or a hig

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.