vimarsana.com

Page 3 - நுகர்வோர் சட்டப்பூர்வமானது வைத்தியம் நாடகம் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

California banned state-funded travel to Florida Meet the LGBT leader who made it happen

California banned state-funded travel to Florida Meet the LGBT leader who made it happen
msn.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from msn.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

Fortnite court decisions show risks of contracting with minors

Chick-fil-A sued by customers unhappy with delivery fees

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (Legal Newsline) - Chick-fil-A was accused of deceptive delivery fee practices in a Sacramento County Superior Court lawsuit. The complaint was filed on March 11 by plaintiff Ronald Ortega and was removed to federal court on May 7. According to the complaint, the restaurant began food delivery service through a mobile application at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.  The complaint accuses Chick-fil-A of falsely advertising the delivery fee as $3.99, when it is actually much higher because food costs for delivered food are marked up by 25-30%.  The fast food restaurant is charged with violation of California s Unfair Competition Law, violation of California s Consumer Legal Remedies Act and violation of California s False Advertising Law.

Sprint brought to court for allegedly trapping customers in cell phone lease

LOS ANGELES (Legal Newsline) - Sprint is backed into a federal class action lawsuit for allegedly misleading consumers and violating California s Unfair Competition Law and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act.  The complaint was filed on May 6 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California by plaintiffs Teresa Gutierrez and Michael Camou.  According to the complaint, Sprint was sued in regard to its Flex Lease Agreement program, a cell phone plan marketed as affordable with low monthly payments and a contract cancellation option.  The plaintiffs allege that consumers are forced to pay significantly more than the value of their phones because of the mobile carrier s monthly charges after the lease ends, the requirement to make additional payments at the end of the lease in order to own the device and the inability for consumers to cancel their contract after the lease period has ended. 

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.