Page 11 - பிராங்க்ஃபர்ட் அதிக பிராந்திய நீதிமன்றம் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Facts The plaintiff, a furniture manufacturer, had sent exhibits by truck to a furniture trade fair in Moscow and the transport s organisation had been assigned to a freight forwarding company. The shipment was insured with the defendant on the basis of the General Terms and Conditions for Exhibition Insurance (1998, January 2009 version), which stipulated two transport insurance risk exclusions concerning: the risk of confiscation, seizure or other intervention by public authorities; and any damage caused by missing or defective packaging. In the current case, the shipment was damaged during a customs inspection in Russia. According to the plaintiff, customs authorities had removed the exhibits and repacked them incorrectly – in particular, they had failed to use adequate packaging. The exhibits were significantly damaged and the plaintiff demanded compensation from the insurer as defendant. Such compensation out of the insurance policy was denied with reference to the aboveme

Frankfurt higher regional courtFrankfurt regional courtFederal courtExhibition insuranceபிராங்க்ஃபர்ட் அதிக பிராந்திய நீதிமன்றம்பிராங்க்ஃபர்ட் பிராந்திய நீதிமன்றம்கூட்டாட்சியின் நீதிமன்றம்கண்காட்சி காப்பீடு