Advertisement
New Jersey Appellate Division Finds that Evidence of 510(k) Clearance Cannot be Categorically Excluded in Medical Device Product Liability Cases Wednesday, April 21, 2021
FDA clears the vast majority of medical devices for marketing through the 510(k) process. In product liability cases involving 510(k) medical devices, plaintiffs often seek to exclude 510(k) evidence from trial based on arguments that: (1) the 510(k) process is less rigorous than the pre-market approval (PMA) process, and does not include the FDA’s independent evaluation of safety and efficacy; (2) the jury may place undue emphasis on the FDA’s 510(k) clearance; and (3) admission of the evidence leads to mini-trials on the meaning and significance of the 510(k) clearance. Device manufacturers typically oppose the exclusion of 510(k) evidence because it unfairly prevents them from explaining to the jury the regulatory requirements and framework that dictate their decision making. In a p
New Jersey’s appeals court refused to toss their conviction as unconstitutional.
In “Mein Kampf,” Hitler described the Nazis’ new flag: “In red we see the social idea of the movement, in white the nationalistic idea, in the swastika the mission of the struggle for the victory of the Aryan man, and, by the same token, the victory of the idea of creative work, which as such always has been and always will be anti-Semitic.” (National Museum of American History via Courthouse News)
TRENTON, N.J. (CN) Two men convicted under New Jersey’s Anti-Terrorism Act for fire-bombing and vandalizing five Jewish houses of worship nearly a decade ago lost appellate challenges Thursday.
Victory for New Jersey Adults Who Provide Home Care for Parents natlawreview.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from natlawreview.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Imagine this: You litigate a case for years. Your opponent wins summary judgment. You appeal. The appellate court agrees that the summary judgment was erroneous and remands for trial.
Imagine this: You litigate a case for years. Your opponent wins summary judgment. You appeal. The appellate court agrees that the summary judgment was erroneous and remands for trial..