vimarsana.com

Page 44 - ப்ரெஸிடெஂட் பிராங்க்ளின் டெலானோ ரூஸ்வெல்ட் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Shaheen, Kuster, Pappas oppose US Supreme Court expansion; Hassan has concerns

Shaheen, Hassan, Kuster, Pappas oppose US Supreme Court expansion All-Democratic NH congressional delegation weighs in on newly unveiled bill to expand court to 13 justices Share Updated: 8:56 PM EDT Apr 15, 2021 Shaheen, Hassan, Kuster, Pappas oppose US Supreme Court expansion All-Democratic NH congressional delegation weighs in on newly unveiled bill to expand court to 13 justices Share Updated: 8:56 PM EDT Apr 15, 2021 U.S. Sens. Jeanne Shaheen and Maggie Hassan and U.S. Reps. Annie Kuster and Chris Pappas are unanimous in opposing the proposed expansion of the number of seats on the U.S. Supreme Court.(This report has been updated to include a clarification by Sen. Maggie Hassan s office of a spokesperson s initial comment to WMUR on the proposed expansion of the number of justices on the U.S. Supreme Court.)The four Democratic members of the New Hampshire’s congressional delegation weighed in Thursday after U.S. Sen. Ed Markey, D-Massachusetts, a

Democrats, a la FDR, float court-packing idea to chill conservative justices

Watch it, or we’ll really add another four justices who will rule and vote nothing but Democrat-slash-socialist. “Pelosi dismisses progressive ‘court packing’ legislation,” Politico wrote, about Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s reaction to all the push to pack. “Pelosi rejects fellow Democrats’ ‘court-packing’ bill, will not bring it to vote,” the New York Post wrote. “Democratic leaders throw cold water on proposal to expand Supreme Court,” The Washington Post wrote. “Democrats’ Court-Packing Plan Dead on Arrival as Nancy Pelosi Won’t Consider It,” Newsweek wrote. Yes. Because pragmatically speaking, throwing more judges on the highest court in the land would backfire on Democrats. What’s goes around, comes around. Soon enough, Republicans would simply add their own. 

Packing SCOTUS remains a bonehead political blunder for Democrats

Packing SCOTUS remains a ‘bonehead’ political blunder for Democrats Updated Apr 16, 2021; This is an opinion column The only reason some Democrats want to change the number of justices on the United States Supreme Court is because Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton. As a senator in 1983, Joe Biden referred to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s court-packing effort as a “bonehead idea” and “terrible mistake” that eroded the independence of the Supreme Court. It remains so today, and it’s also a political gift for Republicans. If Hillary Clinton had filled the vacancies left by Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, we wouldn’t be having the conversation about Supreme Court “reforms.” Democratic court-packers are singularly focused on delivering the judicial outcomes progressives want regardless of the cost to America.

Critics say plan by power-mad Dems will blow up in their faces

Critics say plan by power-mad Dems will blow up in their faces Friday, April 16, 2021  |  OneNewsNow.com Staff (OneNewsNow.com) Spanish While they may have a majority in Congress, Democrats face an uphill battle with a bill to increase the number of justices on the Supreme Court from 9 to 13. Conservative critics don t expect them to succeed – and some even argue it will benefit Republicans. Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California) reportedly has no plans to bring the bill from Representatives Jerry Nadler (D-New York), Mondaire Jones (D-New York), and Hank Johnson (D-Georgia) to the floor for a vote. Senator Ed Markey (D-Massachusetts) also supports the legislation – but like Pelosi, Democratic Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, was noncommittal as well.

Democrats, a la FDR, float court-packing idea to chill conservative justices

Democrats, a la FDR, float court-packing idea to chill conservative justices
washingtontimes.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from washingtontimes.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.