Wage and Hour Attorneys, Zakay Law Group, APLC and JCL Law Firm, APC, File Lawsuit Against TVI, Inc., Alleging Failure to Provide Compliant Meal and Rest Periods
Share Article
The lawsuit alleges TVI, Inc. violated the California Labor Code by requiring employees to remain on-premises and on-duty during rest periods.
If you would like to know more about the TVI, Inc. lawsuit, please contact Attorney Jackland K. Hom today by calling (619) 255-9047. SAN FRANCISCO (PRWEB) March 16, 2021 The San Francisco labor law attorneys, at Zakay Law Group, APLC and JCL Law Firm, APC, filed a complaint alleging that TVI, Inc. committed multiple violations of the California Labor Code. The TVI, Inc. lawsuit, Case No. 21CV376407, is currently pending in the Santa Clara County Superior Court of the State of California. A copy of the Complaint can be read here.
California s Supreme Court Rejects Employer Use of Time-Rounding Policies in the Meal Period Context | Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
jdsupra.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from jdsupra.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
February 2021: The Top 17 Labor And Employment Law Stories | Fisher Phillips
jdsupra.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from jdsupra.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
In
Sargent v. Board of Trustees of California State University, 2021 WL 836135 (March 5, 2021), the First Appellate District Court of Appeal ruled that while public entity employers were not entirely exempt from liability for civil penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”), they could be liable only where the Labor Code provisions at issue themselves provided for civil penalties. They could not be liable for default penalties under Labor Code § 2699(f). The Court therefore reversed a jury award of over $2.9M in PAGA penalties against California State University.
The plaintiff in
Sargent was a licensed asbestos consultant for the Sonoma State University’s (which is a part of the CSU system, and a public employer) environmental health & safety office. Sargent alleged that he complained to his supervisor Dawson about his concerns of environmental hazards which were ignored, whereupon he informed governmental agencies about his concerns. His allege
Legal Disclaimer
You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review s (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.