vimarsana.com

Page 2 - ப்ரோமிதெயௌஸ் வானொலி ப்ராஜெக்ட் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Supreme Court Holding Emphasizes Importance of Building an Administrative Record Before an Agency | WilmerHale

On April 1, 2021, in Federal Communications Commission v. Prometheus Radio Project, 1 the Supreme Court unanimously held that a decision by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to repeal or modify three ownership rules (which limited the number of radio stations, television stations, and newspapers that a single entity may own in a given market) was not arbitrary and capricious for purposes of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The Court specifically rejected the argument, put forward by Prometheus Radio Project (Prometheus), that the FCC’s assessment of the likely impact of the rule changes on minority and female ownership rested on flawed and inadequate data. The Court emphasized that the FCC had repeatedly requested additional data on this topic and, having received none, appropriately analyzed the available data. Among other things, the case demonstrates the importance of providing to agencies any data they request during administrative proceedings; the lesson of

Supreme Court Holds that an FCC Rule Change Was Not Arbitrary and Capricious Under the Administrative Procedure Act | Dechert LLP

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: The U.S. Supreme Court issued a significant decision regarding the Administrative Procedure Act’s (“APA”) arbitrary-and-capricious standard. In FCC v. Prometheus Radio Project, the Court upheld a decision by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) to repeal or modify three rules governing the ownership of broadcast media. The three rules had limited the number of radio stations, television stations, and newspapers that a single entity could own in a given market. Under the Federal Communications Act, the FCC had to consider the public interest before changing its rules. The FCC considered the effects of its rules on competition, localism, and viewpoint diversity before changing the rules in 2017. And the FCC found that changing the rules was not likely to harm minority and female ownership of media sources.

SCOTUS Sides with FCC in Media Ownership Fight with Prometheus

Adam KlasfeldApr 1st, 2021, 11:08 am Former FCC Chairman Ajit Pai Over the howls of protest of nearly half of U.S. states, the Supreme Court unanimously sided with the Federal Communications Commission on Thursday in a ruling finding old regulations limiting cross-ownership of media outlets obsolete. The advocacy group Prometheus Radio Project feared that the shelving the former restrictions, an action undertaken by the FCC’s Trump-appointed ex-chairman Ajit Pai, would weaken ownership and viewpoint diversity in the press. Prometheus had early success in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, which vacated the FCC’s order. But the Supreme Court had the final word, with all nine justices finding that the Commission’s decision to strike the old regulations was not arbitrary and capricious.

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.