Page 2 - மாக்னுசன் பாசி உத்தரவாதத்தை நாடகம் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Right to Repair gets an important ally: the FTC
androidauthority.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from androidauthority.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Procès en août contre les produits reconditionnés d Apple
iphonesoft.fr - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from iphonesoft.fr Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
A class-action lawsuit against Apple is going to trial in August.
It s over claims that Apple s use of refurbished parts and remanufactured devices is a breach of contract.
It could see Apple customers get a payout if the suit is successful.
Apple is facing a trial over a class-action lawsuit that claims that using refurbished and remanufactured parts and devices to repair products like the iPhone is a breach of contract.
As noted by MacRumors, the case will call for trial in August. From the lawsuit s webpage:
The terms and conditions for AppleCare Protection Plan and AppleCare+ provide that when a customer seeks service for a covered iPhone or iPad due to a hardware defect or accidental damage, Apple Inc. will either repair the device or replace it with a device that is either new or equivalent to new in performance and reliability.
Brad S. Tabakin | Tabakin Wolfe
PHILADELPHIA – A Philadelphia couple claim a local tire supplier and auto repair shop improperly conducted an oil change, leading to their vehicle later sustaining complete engine failure.
Virginia Rooney and Thomas Bramante of Philadelphia filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on Jan. 21 versus Mavis Tire Supply, LLC of Philadelphia and Mavis Tire NY, LLC, of Millwood, N.Y.
During the events in question, the plaintiffs owned a 2018 Ford Escape which, prior to Aug. 23, 2020, was in good working order and covered under the manufacturer’s warranty.
“On Aug. 23, 2020, plaintiffs took said Ford to defendants for a routine oil change, something defendants perform on a routine, daily basis and represent and advertise to the general public that defendants are capable of doing in a good and workmanlike manner. On said date, defendants did, in fact, perform an oil change on said Ford