Reps. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and Mo Brooks, R-Ala., are spearheading the effort in the House of Representatives, backed by a group of senators, objecting to the certification of the presidential election results on Jan. 6.
Reps. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and Mo Brooks, R-Ala., explained during an exclusive interview with Sunday Mornings Futures why they are spearheading the effort in the House of Representatives objecting to the certification of the presidential election results on Jan. 6. The ultimate arbiter here, the ultimate check and balance is the United States Congress and when something is done in an unconstitutional fashion, which happened in several of these states, we have a duty to step forward and have this debate and have this vote on the 6th of January, Jordan told host Maria Bartiromo on Sunday.
కేసీయార్ మీద బీజేపీ మైండ్ గేమ్ మొదలుపెట్టేసిందా ?
gulte.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from gulte.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
ఎవరి పరిధిలో వారు | Prajasakti
prajasakti.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from prajasakti.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Monday, December 14, 2020
Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker was within his constitutional authority to issue broad executive orders shutting down most of the state in an effort to restrict the spread of the coronavirus, according to the Supreme Judicial Court’s most recent opinion. The Court’s decision ends a case brought by a diverse group of Massachusetts business and religious organizations that sued the Governor in June. The issue in the suit was the legality of the Governor’s COVID-19 orders which he issued under a state law known as the Civil Defense Act, which granted his office broad authority “to protect the public peace, health, security and safety, and to preserve the lives and property of the people of the commonwealth”. Recognizing the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Court held that “the Governor is not, as the plaintiffs argue, ‘donning the mantle and crown’… he is making difficult decisions…” in order to execute his duties un