vimarsana.com

முறையீடுகள் ஆஃப் மினசோட்டா நீதிமன்றம் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Photovoltaic Solar Energy System/Conditional Use Permit: Minnesota Appellate Court Addresses Challenge to Denial | Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P L L C

The Court of Appeals of Minnesota (“Court”) in a July 12th Opinion addressed an issue arising out of the proposed construction of a photovoltaic solar energy system (“System”). See In the Matter of the Application of United States Solar Corporation and USS Water Fowl Solar LLC for a Conditional Permit, 2021 WL 2909044. The issue involved the denial of the System’s application for a conditional use permit (“CUP”). United States Solar Corporation and USS Water Fowl Solar, LLC (collectively “Solar Corp.”) applied to the McLeod County, Minnesota, (“County”) Planning Commission (“Commission”) to construct a .5-MW system on 10 acres of farmland. The Commission recommended to the County Board (“Board”) approval subject to certain conditions.

United statesMcleod countySolar corpWater fowl solarUnited states solar corporationPlanning commissionAppeals of minnesota courtFowl solarConditional permitStates solar corporationCounty boardஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில்மக்ல்ந்ட் கவுண்டிசூரிய கார்ப்திட்டமிடல் தரகுமுறையீடுகள் ஆஃப் மினசோட்டா நீதிமன்றம்

Chemical-Or-Biological Materials Insurance Policy Exclusion: Minnesota Appellate Court Addresses Denial of Coverage Related to Chemical Glyphosate | Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P L L C

The Court of Appeals of Minnesota (“Court”) addressed in a February 8th Opinion an insurance company’s denial of coverage related to a herbicide containing the chemical glyphosate that was introduced into a mink farm water system. See Lang Fur Farms, Inc., et al. v. Bird Island-Hawk Creek Mutual Ins. Co., 2021 WL 416404. The denial of coverage was based on two exclusions in the insurance policy: • Chemical-or-Biological materials (“Chemical Exclusion”) • Anti-Concurrent-Causation Exclusion (“Anti-Concurrent Exclusion”) The Court’s Opinion provides that Lang Fur Farms and one of its owners (collectively “Lang Fur”) obtained an insurance policy in part from Bird Island – Hawk Creek Mutual Insurance Company (“Bird Island”).

Court opinionSee lang fur farms incHawk creek mutual insurance company bird islandAppeals of minnesota courtLang fur farmsIsland hawk creek mutualAnti concurrent causation exclusionBird islandHawk creek mutual insurance companyChemical exclusionLang furAnti concurrent exclusionநீதிமன்றம் கருத்துபார்க்க லாங் ஃபர் பண்ணைகள் இன்க்பருந்து க்ரீக் பரஸ்பர காப்பீடு நிறுவனம் பறவை தீவுமுறையீடுகள் ஆஃப் மினசோட்டா நீதிமன்றம்

Industrial Waste Landfill/Nonconforming Use: Minnesota Appellate Court Addresses Whether Maintenance Constitutes Use | Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P L L C

AIM Development (USA), LLC v. City of Sartell, 2020 WL 7134863. The issue considered was whether the landowner discontinued its legal nonconforming use for more than one year. AIM Development (USA), LLC (“AIM”) began operating in 1984 a storage and disposal facility for nonhazardous, nontoxic industrial waste (“Landfill”). The Landfill was a permitted use at that time. However, in 1989 the City of Sartell (“Sartell”) rezoned the property. Nevertheless, the Landfill continued operating as a legal nonconforming use from 1989 to 2012. The operation was considered a legal nonconforming use because it was collecting waste generated exclusively as part of the operation of an adjacent paper mill.

United statesCity of sartellMinnesota legislatureDevelopment united statesDistrict court orderDistrict courtMinnesota pollution control agencyAppeals of minnesota courtஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில்நகரம் ஆஃப் சர்த்தேல்ள்மினசோட்டா சட்டமன்றம்வளர்ச்சி ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில்மாவட்டம் நீதிமன்றம் ஆர்டர்மாவட்டம் நீதிமன்றம்முறையீடுகள் ஆஃப் மினசோட்டா நீதிமன்றம்

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.