Page 19 - மேரிலாந்து வழக்கறிஞர் ஜநரல் பிரையன் உறைபனி News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Three post-Trump vacancies will allow Biden to place his stamp on Maryland s federal trial court
baltimoresun.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from baltimoresun.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
As Comcast internet data threshold looms, Baltimore City Council calls for price gouging investigation
phillyvoice.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from phillyvoice.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Baltimore councilmen request price-gouging investigation into Comcast internet data cap; grace period extended to August
baltimoresun.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from baltimoresun.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Baltimore City leaders are asking the state to investigate Comcast s data cap as a form of predatory price gouging.Baltimore City Councilmembers Zeke Cohen, Ryan Dorsey, Kristerfer Burnett, and the Baltimore Digital Equity Coalition sent a letter Tuesday to Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh urging him to open an investigation.|| Read the full letter ||The letter states Comcast established a 1.2 TB data cap on service plans for new and existing customers on Jan. 1. The letter states that after a three-month grace period beginning Jan. 1, customers without unlimited plans will be charged $10 for every 50 GB they use over the 1.2 TB limit, up to a maximum of $100 a month.Cohen told 11 News that he and his colleagues seek the attorney general to look into whether this new data cap constitutes a form of price gouging. We are deeply concerned that consumers in Maryland are being ripped off by this company, that we don t have many options here for internet providers. To learn
US top court dismisses emoluments cases against Trump January 26, 2021
The US Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear a case concerning whether former President Donald Trump violated provisions of the Constitution that bar a president from profiting from a foreign government. Courtesy photo
WASHINGTON The US Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear a case concerning whether former President Donald Trump violated provisions of the Constitution that bar a president from profiting from a foreign government.
The court instructed the lower courts to wipe away previous lower court opinions that went against Trump because he is no longer in office. It leaves unresolved a novel question raised in the case because Trump, unlike other presidents, did not use a blind trust when he assumed the presidency but instead continued to retain an interest in his businesses and let those businesses take money from foreign and domestic governments.