To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
On January 28, 2021, the Federal Circuit affirmed the general principle that the mere fact of copying by an accused infringer is insufficient to rebut a charge of obviousness (
The appeal related to a post-grant review (PGR) challenge brought by L’Oreal against U.S. Patent No. 9,668,954, relating to methods for bleaching hair using maleic acid. We previously reported the Federal Circuit’s decision on appeal of the PGR of a parent patent (
Liqwd, Inc., v. L’Oreal USA, Inc., appeal from PGR2017-00012) here. In
Liqwd, the Federal Circuit concluded that L’Oreal, the accused infringer, would not have developed products using maleic acid without having had access to the confidential information of Liqwd, Inc., the patent owner. Because the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in
Share this article
Share this article
ResearchAndMarkets.com s offering.
The United States Cosmetics Market is anticipated to grow at a healthy rate during the forecast period owing to high penetration rate of global brands coupled with burgeoning demand for natural cosmetics.
Increase in working women population and increasing number of beauty clinics are also aiding the United States Cosmetics Market. Moreover, increasing per capita expenditure on personal appearance, strong regulatory framework and growth in beauty and cosmetics market are some of the other factors expected to propel the demand for cosmetics market over the next five years.
The United States Cosmetics Market is witnessing growing number of both female and male consumers. The desire to look good is making citizens buy cosmetic products in large number. Also, the country is the headquarter of some of the leading global cosmetic brands. The growth in online retail is also adding to the growth of the US cosmeti
Panel: Judges Dyk, Plager, and Moore, with Judge Dyk writing the opinion
You should read this case if: you have a matter involving standard-essential patents and license agreements that include later-developed or acquired intellectual property.
Our case this week features the standard-essential power players of quarantine: cell phones and tablets. If you’re wondering how your trusted devices fared, please do read on.
Evolved owns a standard-essential patent (SEP) covering 4G/LTE technology for mobile devices. In 2015, Evolved sued several mobile device manufacturers for infringement based on their use of Qualcomm chipsets to make multi-mode, or LTE, mobile devices.
But here’s the catch. The patent’s original owner, LGE, had granted a license to Qualcomm back in 1993. This license agreement barred patent infringement claims against Qualcomm and its customers for use of LGE patents that are technically or commercially necessary to make, sell, or use a “Sub