Any time-periods mentioned in this Article may be extended by mutual agreement.
Sellers and suppliers should check with each states in which they have sales to determine if they are required to register and to collect and remit sales tax or review the Remote Seller and Marketplace Seller Guidelines. For information on a specific state’s exemptions or exempt entities, please contact that state. When a Drop Shipper delivers a product to the seller’s customer in a Streamlined Full Member State, the seller may use the sellers sales tax registration number from the sellers state on the exemption certificate provided to the Drop Shipper. The seller is not required to provide a sales tax registration number from the state to which the sale is sourced when purchasing products for resale agreement. Developer agrees to provide reasonable access to any parties authorized by the Client for purposes of website audits, updates, or modifications. PandaTip: This section of the template clearly
The Use of Commercial Arbitration Rules in Investment Treaty Disputes brill.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from brill.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
When it comes to arbitration provisions, you may get more than you bargained for. The Third District Court of Appeals recently confirmed that by signing an arbitration provision, the signatory may be forced to arbitrate by a non-signatory.
On March 17, 2021, the Third DCA issued the opinion in
Kratos Investments vs. ABS Healthcare Services, et al. The Third DCA relied on the doctrine of equitable estoppel to prevent the signatory to an arbitration agreement, ABS, from avoiding the arbitration clause of an agreement it negotiated. The arbitration dispute between the parties arose after ABS sued Kratos over an alleged scheme to steal ABS’ business. ABS alleged that Kratos conspired with ABS’s own agents in a scheme to steal ABS’s business by illegally soliciting ABS’s customers and misappropriating ABS’s confidential information and trade secrets. ABS also sued eight of its own agents.
In the recent decision of
Blackmon v. O3 Insight,
Inc., C.A. No. 2020-1014-SG (Del. Ch. Mar. 9, 2021), the
Delaware Court of Chancery held that the arbitrability of a
Delaware director s claim for advancement must be determined by
an arbitrator.
The Petitioner, Theodore Blackmon, is a director and stockholder
of respondent O3 Insight, Inc. (the Company ), a
Delaware corporation. In September of 2020, the Company sued
Blackmon in Alabama alleging breach of his fiduciary duty to the
Company. The Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Company
provide for advancement following tender of an undertaking to
repay.
Blackmon filed an action in the Delaware Court of Chancery