AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin File
The Supreme Court says it ll take a case that may erode Roe v. Wade and affect reproductive rights.
The court previously allowed abortion-pill access to be limited during the coronavirus pandemic.
An expert told Insider arrests for seeking abortions could increase if Roe v. Wade were overturned.
The US Supreme Court on Monday announced plans to take up a major abortion case that could allow it to severely limit or overturn landmark court rulings on abortion, including Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
The case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women s Health Organization, concerns a law in Mississippi that bans most abortions after 15 weeks, SCOTUSblog first noted.
The Supreme Court agreed to take up a major abortion case that threatens to erode Roe v Wade yahoo.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from yahoo.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Former DOJ prosecutor James Trusty and retired NYPD Detective Pat Brosnan react on America s Newsroom.
Department of Justice priorities obviously can change with new administrations, and history shows this with regularity. Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy was greatly concerned with the Mafia’s activities, and John Ashcroft wanted more obscenity and pornography prosecutions.
Generally, the subject matter emphasis pops up and recedes, while the rank and file of DOJ continue prosecuting the cases that matter most in their districts. But it is wise to keep an eye on civil rights right now, as this particular division seems to be on a particularly aggressive, reinvigorated, and high-profile mission.
February 15, 2018 For better and for worse, in sickness and in health, Dean Allard gets up and reads a bit every morning. He then calls an Uber. It s my life, Allard said. It s time to go see his girl. It s been a long time that we ve been together. I just.I just don t know any better. The Uber shows up and Dean climbs in. It takes him a couple ofÃÂ .
Print this article The Justice Department notified the journalists earlier this month but did not state the reason for the seizure. (Getty Images)
Under former President Donald Trump, the Justice Department went after sources in unauthorized leak cases by obtaining phone records of journalists, a practice the Biden administration, which has sought to rebuke so much of the last White House s agenda, is now defending.
One case revealed last week was worse than Nixon because Nixon never actually seized any records, former White House Counsel John Dean told the
Washington Examiner, adding that this was because former President Richard Nixon could develop no real probable cause.