vimarsana.com

Page 21 - வெளிநாட்டு உளவுத்துறை கண்காணிப்பு நீதிமன்றம் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

First Amendment Groups Press Supreme Court For Access To Surveillance Court Opinions

Alex Brandon/AP toggle caption Alex Brandon/AP Ted Olson, the former Bush-era solicitor general, is part of a coalition of First Amendment groups asking the Supreme Court to review decisions of the intelligence courts. Alex Brandon/AP First Amendment groups are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to make public major decisions authorizing government surveillance, opinions that until now have remained almost secret. For years, the ACLU and other groups have maintained that the public has a First Amendment right to see major decisions of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, decisions that authorize everything from surveillance of suspected spies and terrorists to metadata mining aimed at ferreting out potential terrorist plots, including those that involve contacts between foreigners and American citizens.

Supreme Court asked to give access to secretive court s work

Supreme Court asked to give access to secretive court s work MARK SHERMAN, Associated Press FacebookTwitterEmail 3 1of3FILE - In this Sept. 7, 2018 file photo, then former Solicitor General Theodore Olson testifies on a panel of experts and character witnesses before the Senate Judiciary Committee on behalf of President Donald Trump s Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh on the final day of the confirmation hearing, on Capitol Hill in Washington. Civil liberties groups are asking the Supreme Court to give the public access to opinions of the secretive court that reviews bulk email collection, warrantless internet searches and other government surveillance programs. The groups say in an appeal filed with the high court Monday that the public has a constitutional right to see significant opinions of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The appeal was filed by Theodore Olson on behalf of the American Civil Liberties Union and the Knight First Amendment Institut

There s a Big Gap in Our Cyber Defenses Here s How to Close It

There’s a Big Gap in Our Cyber Defenses. Here’s How to Close It. POLITICO 6 hrs ago © U.S. Army photo by Mike Strasser/USMA PAO Cyber Defense Exercise, 2013 The foreign hackers behind the massive cybersecurity failures dominating recent headlines had one critical strategy in common – they leased computers in the United States to burrow into their victim’s networks. Because U.S. cybersecurity systems don’t regard domestic connections as inherently suspect, the attackers were able to hide in plain sight. Like secretive investors deploying a series of shell companies and trusts to mask true ownership, Russia, China and other sophisticated nations effect cyber-maliciousness through a series of intermediary, innocuous-looking internet servers.

Supreme Court asked to make foreign intelligence court opinions public

Supreme Court asked to make foreign intelligence court opinions public The ACLU and other groups asked the Supreme Court on Monday to consider whether a special court that reviews government requests for electronic surveillance for foreign intelligence purposes must disclose significant opinions that came after 9/11. The filing marks the first time the Supreme Court has been asked to resolve whether the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court must make its secret opinions public subject to redactions. The groups, which also include the Knight Institute and the Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic at Yale Law School, are represented by former George W. Bush Solicitor General Theodore R. Olson.

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.