Opinion: Protecting nature : vimarsana.com

Opinion: Protecting nature


When corporate ex-executives are absurdly hypocritical, yet so obtuse that they don’t even realize it, is it still hypocrisy… or are they just dimwitted?
Consider the histrionics emanating from corporate bunkers over rising public approval for the idea that nature be given legal rights that are enforceable in courts. The Rights of Nature movement argues that if, say, a mining conglomerate decapitates a mountain, that injured citizen of our natural world ought to have its day in court. “Outrageous,” shriek the honchos of Corporate America — the courts are for people¸ not for pieces of property!
Hello, hypocrisy. After all, a corporation is not a person — it has no brain, no pulse, no soul, no life. It’s not even a real piece of property, just an inert document printed by a state. Yet, the owners of that piece of paper claim that it magically bestows “personhood” on their syndicate, giving it the legal and political rights of real people. Yet, these “paper people” now cry that Earth’s actual living creatures can’t have any legal rights because they are just property. Excuse me, but a single drop of water has more life in it than all the corporations in the world.

Related Keywords

Florida , United States , Orange County , America , , Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund , Corporate America , Legal Opinion , Corporate Law , Nature , Legal Counsel , Mining , Fed , புளோரிடா , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , ஆரஞ்சு கவுண்டி , அமெரிக்கா , சமூக சுற்றுச்சூழல் சட்டப்பூர்வமானது பாதுகாப்பு நிதி , பெருநிறுவன அமெரிக்கா , சட்டப்பூர்வமானது கருத்து , பெருநிறுவன சட்டம் , இயற்கை , சட்டப்பூர்வமானது ஆலோசனை , சுரங்க , ஊட்டி ,

© 2025 Vimarsana