Civil practice – Commitment – COVID-19 : vimar

Civil practice – Commitment – COVID-19
Where a judge committed a respondent to the Stonybrook Stabilization & Treatment Center, the commitment order must be vacated because the judge did not, as required by Foster v. Commissioner of Correction, 484 Mass. 698 (2020), make findings regarding whether the danger posed by the respondent’s substance use disorder outweighs the risk of transmission of
Related Keywords
, Stonybrook Stabilization Treatment Center, Supreme Judicial Court, Stonybrook Stabilization, Treatment Center, Supreme Judicial, Civil Practice, Commitment,