I think it is part of our economy that we have to get right. Right now it is broken. I think what president obama has done with these executive orders has actually made the system worse. And, we destroyed the ability to get some sort of bipartisan compromise on the steps we need to take by congress. I think it is easy for people to attack donald trump over what he said. I think they ought to listen to what he is saying. I actually know donald trump. He is not a racist. He is trying to characterize the fact that a broken immigration system can lead to a lot of problems like crime. The challenge i would give back to his critics is, do we actually know everything about this population that we think we know, this illegal population . We ought to know. I for one think we should embrace those folks who can make america stronger, better, and help grow our economy. That is the filter i would put it through. Pete schroeder im curious about your thoughts on trump as a candidate. We have gone through a couple cycles that he has made noise, but this time he is actually part of the race. It is a very crowded field. Is he a good voice to have in the gop debate at this point . Matt schlapp i think there is a click, a political click, in circles. Some people are part of the click and some people outside. Donald trump is outside the click. He is not the candidate that people who work on republican campaigns would favor. He resonates with a lot of americans. It is undeniable. What he is saying is working out there in the country. Look, he has his own way, his own words. I dont agree with everything he is saying. Like i said, the tone on questions of immigration we should be a lot more careful. It leads to people drawing false conclusions. Susan brought up the American Conservative Union, the group that i chair is a union, not in the sense of a labor union, but a political coalition. What the right has to do is string together everybody from the center all the way to the right part of politics, and bring them together. It would be a massive mistake for the Republican Party to start to kick people out and ostracize them. We will not win president ial elections that way. The left has taught us over and over. They have strident voices that care about single issues, and they string them together, including a lot of other mainstream americans, and they have been very successful at the president ial level. We should be able to do that. Susan swain how do you see this now 14 person field sorting itself out . Matt schlapp i think it is great for journalists. You must be enjoying this. Every day someone says something that makes a great story. That being said, it is good for the party that i associate with, the Republican Party. Im a conservative first, but i associate with the Republican Party. I think it is good for the party. We need to have a big public conversation, including disagreements, on what we stand for. Obama has loomed large over politics. What has happened in politics in our country is people have reacted against what president obama has put forward. It is a time for us to say what we stand for, without having everything start with, i would fight obama on how about, i would stand up for although i think obama will still loom very large over the next election, i think it is a referendum on a third obama presidency. We have to put out there what we think. I think debates, conversations a lot of interaction, with the president answering reporters questions will help us get there. Pete schroeder in terms of transparency, jeb bush just released three decades worth of tax returns. Should other candidates try to get that information out there . Matt schlapp we live in an era of transparency. I think getting out as much information as you can is a very positive thing to do. Jeb bush is an honorable man, he has nothing to hide. He should put it all out there as he has. Carly fiorina has done something similar. You mentioned donald trump. He has also been much more people were surprised that he was so forthcoming with his finances too. He seems very readily willing to do something similar. I think, just in the age we are in, you need to have transparency. Sean sullivan it has been a couple of busy week for the Supreme Court. I wanted to get your thoughts on a couple of the decisions, specifically the decision they handed down on gay marriage. We have seen a split among some republican candidates for president. Some say we should keep fighting. We should push for a constitutional ammendment to define marriage as being between a man and woman. Others, such as jeb bush and marco rubio, say the fight is for religious freedom at this point. Where do you come down . Do you think republicans should push for a constitutional amendment . Matt schlapp let me start off by saying dont you think it is interesting that when john kerry ran against bush, he was for traditional marriage, not gay marriage. Barack obama when he first ran for president , he was for traditional marriage. Hillary clinton has changed her position. Barack obama has changed his position. We have had a lot of change in a short period of time. When you look at polling numbers, it seems like there has been a shift in acceptance towards gay unions. The question is where does america stand. The constitutional amendment process, i think, is a very honest way to handle this. I would never want to draw metaphors and politics, so lets stop that conversation and start a new one, the question of civil rights in this country. We obviously fought a war over it. We passed three constitutional amendments. The court got involved because these constitutional ammendments were effectively not being implemented. I think on Big Questions in society, when you are in a democracy that cherishes a constitution, you cannot change the words of the constitution without doing it through the amendment process. What the Court Essentially did is they destroy the meaning of these words. People say, well, we should focus on religious freedom enshrined in our first amendment. What will those words mean . I no longer know. I think they will mean what five justices on the Supreme Court say. I think it is very valid for candidates to say we should get to the question of religious freedom. We should have a bipartisan understanding of what they made. Great luminaries on the left like ted kennedy, used to lead this conversation. This is a conversation the left and the right should be able to have together. I hope we do not have to amend the constitution on religious freedom. It is all black and white. We do not have an established church. People have a right to practice or not practice religion. As far as the constitutional amendment on the question of gay marriage, another movement that i care a lot about the right to Life Movement has tried to amend the constitution to protect the unborn is very difficult to get a constitutional amendment passed. People who care a lot about traditional marriage, they have every right to go down the path, but they should have their eyes wide open about how difficult it is. In the meantime, if they decide that is the right effort to put their focus on, we also need to make sure that religious freedoms are not trampled, and i do worry about that. Susan swain before we leave this area, on your website in response to these two landmark decisions, some pretty strong words. Matt schlapp yes. I will admit that we had some internal conversations about what we should say, but i felt pretty strongly about them. Susan swain let me read just some quick quotes to our viewers. About the chief justice, you said that he sprayed graffiti on the constitution. About chief Justice Roberts, and justice kennedy, you call them political hacks without term limits. Matt schlapp thats right. In the first question of graffiti, i dont want to think that five members of the constitution can actually change the meaning of the constitution. Graffiti is they have cosmetically damaged it. John roberts was absolutely dead wrong, i believe, on the decision on obamacare. He was on the Minority Side on the issue of marriage the Constitutional Rights therein. I think the question is whether they are honest with the president who appointed them. People say this shows you that George W Bush did not make the right pick. George w. Bush, george h. W. Bush, and ronald reagan, they all batted about 500 on their picks to the Supreme Court on these really hot button issues. It is a real problem for republicans. If you look at democrat president s, at least in my lifetime, they never whiffed. Every person they picked for that court is very reliable on those hot topics that the left cares about. They bat 1000. We bat 500. That is not a winning formula for making sure that those constitutional protections that conservatives care about, and an original understanding of the constitution, would continue. I think they lied to the president s. Either they lied to the presence, or they have changed their mind over time. If you look, and i did, at the testimony that they gave the senate during the time that they quote unquote interviewed, they said very Different Things certainly in Anthony Kennedys case. He has dozens of decisions before this. There is no question that the kind of justice he said he would be, and the kind of justice he has become, you cannot square it. Yeah, they are acting like political people. John roberts is a good man try to find political harmony for the country on tough issues. Unfortunately, that is not the role of the chief justice. The role of the chief justice is to look at the black letter wall law and square that with the addition. He is not to bring harmony to the people. We can leave that to other people. Not the chief justice of the Supreme Court. He is acting more like a political hack not the person we were so excited and worked so hard to get on the court. Pete schroeder thinning off of that, there have been rulings one that came after samesex marriage and they see it was striking down the in your view, is it a liberal court at this point . Matt schlapp if you look at it, you have john roberts and Anthony Kennedy competing for the title of who is the swing justice. That was not the type of justices that they would be in their confirmation hearings. If you look at the Roberts Court overall, what troubled me most about the Obamacare Decision is i do not think he believes what hes doing. He is fixing a statute that has faulty wording. Why . They had to use this vehicle. It is what had to be the law and there are these fatal flaws. It is not the judiciarys law to fix the statue. That is the legislators job. By the way, in a democracy, it is very important. It allows the American People to reengage on a topic. The American People are working hard all their jobs, engaged in their lives, they are not political like we are. When these issues come back to congress, it gives the American People an opportunity to dig back in. Obamacare has never been popular, it is not popular today. Now, we will have another election where the question of obamacare will loom large over election. One of the reasons that is true is because of what Justice Roberts has done. Sean sullivan i want to move to Foreign Policy for moment. There has been a lot of resistance from republicans on capitol hill to the agreement with iran. What do think and what affect will have on the president ial campaign . Matt schlapp president obama has a completely different model the i saw. George w. Bush, as we know, he had his views and could be assertive in those years, no question. There were times when he wanted to be uncompromising, but by large he thought his role was to work through the democratic process to get what he wanted. What you see with president obama is kind of the opposite. Obamacare happened with only democratic votes, except for that one shortterm congressman from louisiana all democratic votes. All of his other achievements, they are with the president ial pen in the oval office. He has not really worked with the other side. With iran, it is a shame that we have not built a bipartisan compromise on these Big Questions of Foreign Policy. I think it makes us look weak abroad when there is Just One Party is engaged. With big issues, it is that are to have some sort of Bipartisan Coalition on them. On the question of iran, it is what he is done with cuba, is my fear what he is doing in the middle east. He wants a deal. He wants to get to a point where there is harmony with other side. What usually starts off with it as an apology of how america has acted in the past, getting in and negotiating a weak deal, and getting a lot of praise for being a peacemaker. He got a nobel prize even before unpacking his bag in the white house. I think he is creating havoc for Hillary Clinton, quite honestly. Will Hillary Clinton approach all of these issues the same way . She will have to explain and defend it. The thing i think is the saddest is barack obama is fine with iran having a Domestic Nuclear capability and having a nuclear plant, but he will not allow us to build any here. He thinks they are immoral. He thinks the least safe country is fine having these materials. These materials could turn into weapons within a decade. Tripoli a lot of experts say what you get on this path, it will actually go much faster. Once they get these weapons, it is very little we can do to take them away. We just had a panel on the hill about one week ago with mcfarland and flynn, who was essentially let go from the obama administration. He was chief general on intelligence at the pentagon. The big concern is that a republican president cannot come in and necessarily undo all this. Once it goes down a certain track, it is very hard to undo it. It is very important for the senate to do its part and docket knock it down. Pete schroeder on a related note, the president is working towards normalizing relations with cuba. He plans to get an embassy up and running there. Is that another issue where republicans should take a stand and draw a contrast with the president jekyll . Matt schlapp absolutely. My fatherinlaw spent six years in one of Fidel Castros gulags. Terrible things happen. His cell mate was assassinated. My fatherinlaw has three had three buildings in cuba. Fidel castro took those buildings. We basically signed an agreement with them to normalize relations. We did not get any of those buildings back. We did not make them pay reparations for all the people they murdered. They looted the people of cuba and we made them do nothing. That is the type of Foreign Policy that leaves most americans scratching their heads. This is not the way americans do business. We stand up for people. We stand up for human rights. There is i know human rights and cuba. There are more Political Prisoners at the end of this process than the beginning of this process. We are rewarding terror, strong men, and once again, it will loom large over the 2015 2016 president ial race. The American People fundamentally disagree with the foreignpolicy approach of this president. Sean sullivan looking at the 2016 bits, there is more than a dozen candidates. Who is resonating right now with conservative activists . Who is hitting home at the base . Matt schlapp first of all, i have not endorsed any particular candidate. At the American Conservative Union, we do put on cpac which will be march 25. On the top of my head, i am a consumer of news as well, and i deal with a lot of conservative activists across the country, and they love scott walker. They love him because he had taken so many hits. He is like when you were young there was the clown doll you would knock him in the nose and he would pop right back up. Carly fiorina, taking on Hillary Clinton so boldly has really earned her a lot of praise out there. Ted cruz strikes a chord with people. He is the antiwashington candidate. Any candidate that runs against washington this cycle, democrat or republican, will resonate. People really believe that this town is broken. Once again, i think the fact that we have so many candidates there are a lot of republican operatives saying it is a bad thing. That is incorrect. It is a great thing. It is wide open. The secondplace finisher is not the next person standing this time. That is exciting. I think republicans are acting more like democrats. We dont have a plan, it is not organized. We will have a little bit of a chaotic process. Democrats are acting more like republicans with their hand chosen candidate and pushing her through at all costs. By the way, if i were her, this is looking like deja vu all over again. She is the front runner, but Bernie Sanders is gaining a lot of steam. If Elizabeth Warren wants to get in and not endorse Hillary Clinton, that race could get very interesting. Pete schroeder theres a handful of what we call the nontraditional candidates in the gop field. People without a background in politics donald trump, ben carson, Carly Fiorina what do you make of the fact that there are people running for the highest Office Without a background in politics . Matt schlapp there could be candidates to decide to run with no understanding of how the government works. I can think of trump, fiorina, and carson who have not held in office, i think it is great. Carly fiorina, is a conservative woman who has had great business success. She is a great spokesman for ou