domestic terror, most acts of domestic terror are shootings. that they don't feel we should we're interested in that. say so directly. and also it comes from having a motivation and how did he obtain the gun are the most important lack of historical context things. it doesn't form the bulk of our themselves in order to describe. if you study the history of race conversations, though. we're more focused on what bits of this story could contribute in this country, you know this to the conversation that could is old language, not something possibly shape policy. >> what about this manifesto new, that he's recalling the worst rhetoric that black and brown people have faced in this point? how should news outlets approach country for a long time. >> let's get into what is really covering the words of an attacker, whether it's in uncomfortable here. in this racist essay that christchurch, california or elsewhere? >> i like calling it an essay. appears to be published by the el paso attacker, he uses words the grandiosity of those words, like invasion, his ppanic it's one small thing we could do. we don't think of the way that invasion. wesley, we know who else has been using those words for perpetrators are seeing this in years. >> of course. >> it's not just president elevating them. i'm glad to hear that, i don't trump. although we could put up on screen six of the times he has think we need to focus on the why anymore and newsrooms, for used the word invasion. right wing commentators, other the most part, aren't. we used to be fascinated, that political leaders who talk this would dominate the coverage. way about fellow citizens of the >> what caused the gunman to do world, fellow people. this? that was columbine. >> certainly. >> and for years, that's what we have multiple strands of