> if we allow supreme court nominees to lie under oath and secure lifetime appointments to the highest court of the land and then issue, issue without basis there must be consequences for such a deeply destabilizing action and hostile takeover of our democratic institutions. >> sandra: must be consequences for lying supreme court justices when there is absolutely no proof that that was the case. >> no, go back and check the Get Live News Updates Every Minute from vimarsana.com Curated from 23000 News Agencies."> > if we allow supreme court nominees to lie under oath and secure lifetime appointments to the highest court of the land and then issue, issue without basis there must be consequences for such a deeply destabilizing action and hostile takeover of our democratic institutions. >> sandra: must be consequences for lying supreme court justices when there is absolutely no proof that that was the case. >> no, go back and check the Get Live News Updates Every Minute from vimarsana.com Curated from 23000 News Agencies." property="og:description"> > if we allow supreme court nominees to lie under oath and secure lifetime appointments to the highest court of the land and then issue, issue without basis there must be consequences for such a deeply destabilizing action and hostile takeover of our democratic institutions. >> sandra: must be consequences for lying supreme court justices when there is absolutely no proof that that was the case. >> no, go back and check the Get Live News Updates Every Minute from vimarsana.com Curated from 23000 News Agencies.">

Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vimarsana.com

nine supreme court justices have done well in 1869, but i "new york times" op ed has this case in this headline. how to look at a supreme court. and as a push to impeach supreme court justices. democratic congresswoman is on board. >> if we allow supreme court nominees to lie under oath and secure lifetime appointments to the highest court of the land and then issue, issue without basis there must be consequences for such a deeply destabilizing action and hostile takeover of our democratic institutions. >> sandra: must be consequences for lying supreme court justices when there is absolutely no proof that that was the case. >> no, go back and check the

Related Keywords

Opinion , Supreme Court , Nine Supreme Court , Push To Impeach Supreme Court , The New York Times , Headline , Op Ed , Nine , 1869 , Democratic , Congresswoman , Issue , Oath , Court , Lifetime , Consequences , Land , Nominees , Basis , Appointments , Sandra Smith , Action , Proof , Be Consequences For Lying Supreme Court , Institutions , Takeover ,

© 2024 Vimarsana