Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vimarsana.com
was trying to make the case that because there's a scope that's wide, includes a look into the president's involvement in the illegal conspiracy to hide those hush money payments as well as other things, that this is a tacit acknowledgment, the mueller report itself, is not sufficient for the beginning of impeachment inquiry. what's your response to that? >> i think that's totally wrong. there were dozens of criminal indictments that came out of the mueller investigation. there were seven guilty pleas and criminal convictions and we learned of nine or ten different episodes of presidential obstruction. it's just that that's a very narrow snapshot of all of the lawlessness taking place in the trump administration and it happens to be one that is not the most intuitive to the public. i think that the public understands that the president is essentially a businessman, albeit a failed and corrupt businessman, but that's what he is. and he has turned the government into a for profit enter price and he's eluding the assets. every time he goes down to