Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vimarsana.com
do. the truth, is i just in the number of justices on the bench, it is not as polarizing and radical as some cautious dems would have you believe. as the court's own website acknowledges, the number changed six times before settling it nine in 1869. and even since that date, the number of justices on the bench hasn't always been consistent. need i remind you of 2016, when republicans launched an 11 month blockade a mayor garland's nomination to the supreme court, in the wake of antonin scalia. they kept the supreme court and just eight justices for almost a year. and they are stating the stage to do something similar again. mitch mcconnell has said he won't commit to any hearings for a biden scotus pick, if his party retake the senate and he becomes majority leader in 2023. radical is not changing the size of the court, something that has been done many times before, including by the republican six years ago. radical is what this current court has been doing over the