practical solution peace, if the international community applies resolve rather than issue resolutions, it can hold israel to a referendum. hello and welcome, you're watching iran today. in this episode we'll be diagnosing conflict resolution, iranian style. but why should the islamic republic of iran be so concerned about the palestinian issue? in other words, what is the significant palestine for iran in the first place? we this question from mr. an iranian political analyst. certainly issue of palistin is not only important for this. republic of iran, but for all muslims, free people, and even for christians, there islamic, christian, and even jewish sanctities exist, and they should be respected. the regime we have seen clearly aims to dominate the region, disrupt regional relations, and render the area un safe and unstable. undly, from this perspective, the islamic republic of view on the palestinian issue, and his other perspective is a humane perspective. in my opinion, this... islamic republic of iran pays more attention to the islamic viewpoint on palestine. ultimately there was a nation called palestine and palestinians lived there. there are documents from israeli authority that indicate palestinian origins and it's evident and documented that a land named palestine existed, not israel. israel is fabricate name, but the palestinian issue can also be significant for tehran from another point of view. mr. mehdi shakibai, the... of initiated by the victorious powers of war i of with the aim of exploding and plundering the regions of hold significance for the islamic a republic of iran. fundamentally the philosophy behind the regime's establishment is to confront any country the interests of america in the region, proposing the interest of the colonial powers victorious in world war i. hence from national perspective, the israel regime could pose a threat to iran's national security, thus the issue of palestine can be viewed from this angle as well. with this resolution or referendum, the decades long occupation palestine may end, but it will happen in a civilized fashion for both sides, it will bring peace to the region and it may not be the worst thing for jews, because in determining their destiny, palestinians may vote for israeli settlers to stay in a reassembled palestine. this is dr. majid عباسی, the deen of the law and political science faculty at allame tab university. the solution proposed by the. leadership was to hold free in palestine. all palestinian refugees who left palestine after 1948 have the right to return to the occupied lands have the right to vote and form the future government in palestine. you know that since the regime's establishment, the israelis have imposed several major wars on the region: in 1948, in 1956, 1967 and 1973. these are four major wars imposed on the region and the regime is still continues with its war mongering. the solution refers. to by the leadership is not about eliminating israel or jews. the islamic republic of iran has no issue with jews, but it has a problem with zionists who are invaders, opires and have deprived the palestinian people of their. to determine their own destiny. they kill women, children, and non-combatants in palestine. there's proposal is based on democracy. western countries claim that democracy is essential for them, and in democracy it's said that every individual has the right to vote. according to the proposal, palestinians and jews present in the occupied territories can participate in a referendum. they can vote, and naturally the future government, whatever it might be really the legitimate government of palestine, and this is the best outcome that could happen. now what is the referendum all about? it's exactly that, a referendum or democratic vote to uphold palestinian undeniable right to self-determination by the original inhabitants of palestine before 1948 when israel was created. it has nothing to do with throwing jews into the sea or setting half of palestine on fire. that sort of method was applied by nausi ashkan nazi europeans and threatened by arabs who saw their brothers being thrown out of their homes by nominal. proclamation regarding israel's disappearance within 25 years was misconstrued ironing implying iran's direct intend to orchestrate this event notion starkly divergent from the recent clarification by leader: contrary to the misleading perception, the leader's statements harbor distint connotations as articulated in their recent address, however intentional or inadvertent misconstructions persist both within and outside iran amplified by opposition factions and even within designist sphere. this escute interpretation perpetuates narrative of existential threat positioning iran as the agent of destruction. this narrative propagated intentionally or otherwise faster. که صحبت می کنن به دروغ میگن که ایران میگه که بایستی یهودی ها رو یا صهیونیستا رو به دریا بریزند نه این حرف و دیگران یه وقتایی قبل ها کسی از عربها گفتن ما هیچ وقت نگفتیم اینو ما کسی رو به دریا نمی رسیم ما میگیم نظر مردم نظر اون دولتی که با آرای مردم فلسطین تشکیل شد تصمیم گیری خواهد کرد درباره مردم که اونجا هستن از. in five points before iran's leader the revolution, ayatollah khamenei pressed on with its importance. the first point is that all original palestinians, be they muslim, christian or jewish, are entitled to participating in the referendum. dr. hosein ruivaran of tehran faculty of world studies believes iran's referendum proposal. is one the best, although the west doesn't take it seriously. جمهوری اسلامی ایران. the islamic republic of iran ardently advocates for a resolution to the young predicament. while iran has developed a strategy and solution, regrettable stakeholders, particularly western powers seem devoid of a clear strategy. instead, they resort to accusations and fail to uphold the resolutions they themselves indorse. this behavior signals deliberate attempt to valify the islamic republic of iran. iran's solution stands as one of the most progressive and viable plans aligning rigorously with international standards, both in its political design and practical application. never, iran faces baseless accusations of fostering insecurity coupled with efforts to bolster theist regimes control over the entire populace in this region. such actions the startly contradict the foundational principles of democracy and equity. the second point in the process of the referendum is that representatives of the palestinian people. be they muslim, christian or jewish, will themselves hold a management role in all plan stages and in executing the plan. the third point is to facilitate participation by all palestinians in the referendum, especially displaced palestinians, a worldwide project will have to be implemented, that would be identifying, conducting a consensus on and registrating the identity of all palestinian citizens in palestine and elsewhere. an international organization. will be responsible for implementing this project in the presence of palestinian representatives. the fourth point is an international committee will be put together under supervision of and in collab. with the united nations, with palestinian representatives present. its purpose would be to execute the set plan and to focus on fundamental palestine historic matters, rulership, sovereignty and of course al-qods. and finally, the fifth point in the process of holding a referendum is that an international fund will be created with help from members the international community under supervision the sick commit to support and see the plan through. the israeli regime does make point of saying. iran wants to wipe israel off the map, what better way to feed iranophobia? occasionally hurts such remarks inside country that is, however, not iran's official line. the country's foreign policy is determined and announced by the leader, then the president, foreign ministry and supreme national security council. the islamic republic of iran supports palestinians to realize their right to freedom and independence and self-determination and choice governmental system. freedom and indep. another issue is human rights, which from the universal declaration of human right to other human rights conventions are matters written by western countries themselves and have nothing to do with the islam republic of iran. according to these principles concerning human rights, one of the rights that nations have is the right to determine their destiny, well the palestinian people who have lived in this land for millennia have the right to decide. their faith and their future. the person who said jews occupying palestine would be thrown into the sea was jamal abdul nasir, the first president of the republic of egypt. saddam hussein decades later said half of palestine would be set a blaze referring to jewish occupied parts obviously. it was during noster's time that the sixth day war of 1967 between israel and an arab league of egypt, syria, jordan and iraq happened. israel unexpectedly preempted the attack. beginning with the destruction egypt's air force on june 5th. not only was occupied land freed by the arab alliance, but israel occupied yet more, that would be a part of egypt, jordan and syria. this marks 10 year since nelson mandela's demise in december 2013, the israel reg genocidal war on gaza. nelson mandela's resolute support for the liberal palestine has come into focus. this edition of africa today is dedicated to nelson mara and palestine. for incisive analysis on this, we have exclusive interviews with mandela mandela, the grandson of neson mandela. we fully support the efforts of the palestinian resistance to oppose the zionist entity and his 75 years of massacers and alvin gods, south africa's deput foreign minister. the genocide that has been executed where this large and ethnic kingdom is unprecedented and unparalleled. there's plenty more to be said, but first a quick media review to give other outlets a chance to get award in. hello everyone and welcome back to news exerbs from all across the world. iran's viewpoint is not involving jews into the sea. writes, the leader of the islamic revolution, i affirmed iran's belief in the necessity of conducting referendum in palestine to gauge the people's opinion, emphasizing that iran's perspective does not entil throwing jews into the sea. moving on, finding the way out of the israel palestine crisis, why a referendum might be the only solution to the problem. ter times wise, it seems that at this point, with the absolute risk god of israely officials towards human lives referendum might be the... only path towards a mutually agreeable future muslims, christians and jews of the region. iran has clear stands on president raisi says, the iranian president raisi has highlighted the fact that islamic republic of iran has a clear stands on the issue of palestine while stressing that asign regime is an occupier. here wise, the iranian president said iran believes that the strategic and democratic way out of the palestinian conflict would be one. that respects the ideas of all palestinians including muslims, christians and jews. now hamas operation of ended us political agenda in region, leaders says quoting from the leader of the islamic revolution met rice historic event of alex storm is against the zinish regime, but it's aimed at the americanization. this incidently literally managed to disrupt the table of american in the region and if this storm. news, it will up the whole table, that's it for me, thank you so much for being with us and see you later. iran's leader actually stressed the importance of a referendum on february. 5th 2020 in addressing various groups, well that was over half a century later than ours, but he did it. ayatollah khamenei praised the brave resistance of palestinians and their freedom fighters against bullying and occupation, but his and iran's proposed method means to ending the israeli occupation is the referendum which was registered by the un in iran's name. it's one of the better solutions. islamic republic of iran proposed comprehensive international reform that enables widest participationating the collective desires and preferences of the concern populist. regretably israel stounchly opposes this proposition, despite the displacement of approximately 70% of the regional palestinian community from the ancestral lands, a substantial majority still resides within the region. if referendum were to transpire, the current demographic composition with nearly 7.3 million palestinians compared to approximately 6.6 million jews indicates lightly outcome favoring the palestinian. iran's proposals with democratic principles and the global discourse and the importance of respecting public opinion, notably any insinuations or rhetoric hinting at violence against jews including notions of drowning them remain utterly divorced from the islamic republic of iran stance, while historical figures such as the late jamal and nasir of egypt may have employed such language in the past. it's crucial to underscore that islamic republican iran has never spouseed any declarations advocating for the subjugation of shoes at sea or otherwise. here's america's solution proposed during the trump era by former us president trump's advisor and son-in-law jared kushner himself jewish. the deal of the century it was named but acted more as deal breaker. it was clearly as inus plant sugar coated as american which at best put other arab leaders in charge of palestinian interests. if the so-called deal of the century had worked, hamas would not have felt pressed to attempting flood operation. that was series of coordinated armed attacks led by hamas from the gaza strip to the gaza envelope of neighboring now israeli occupied territory. various perspectives attempt to address the crocs of the issue surrounding the palestinian crisis, an imperative resolution. iran's proposal avates for a referendum seeking a comprehensive approach. proponents of the two state theory advocate israel from the west bank, gaza streep and jerusalem, however certain stenses, including that of trump's administration appear to l the urgency of resolving this crisis, prioritizing other concerns, they argue that boltering relations with israel and arab states and recognizing israel as legitimate regional entity could potentially mitigate in stability, yet assessing the efficacy of this proposition scrutiny as the regime to diminished security in the region following the abraham courts and associated agreements. this inquiry bears significance considering israel's continued season ga flagrant violation of international norms that warens condemnation. severe suppression persists along the west and coast marked by the tragic tole of the tofan alexa resulting in over 300 fetalities and more than a thousand injuries accompanied by widespread destruction of homes. such green realities underscore the fallacy in asserting that diplomatic ties between israel and select arab nations. all pathway to regional peace. iran's solution to 70 plus years of conflict, perhaps the long conflict the un has had its plate is steadfast and simple. palestine belongs to the palestinians, as it has been documented in history and antiquity. therefore, the destiny of palestine must be decided by the palestinians. in the democratic world of today, that is the only way. in fact, a referendum can put the west to the test to see how true it is to its democratic values. "the proposed referendum would be based on the principle of self-determination, basic birth right for people to decide their own political, economic and social system in gaining international status for themselves. self-determination is a principle recognized by international law to be upheld by governments, whereas it has not been upheld in regard to palestinians, neither when the existence of israeli rule over occupied palestinian territory was first announced, or since united nations general assembly resolution 194 was adopted near the end of the 1947 till 1949 palestine war during which time jewish immigrants to palestine took over. the territory was known as the start of the war as british ruled mandatory palestine. the war or this central component of the nakba ended in the state of israel being established by the jews in may 1948. the creation of israel was conveniently. declared on the last day of the british mandate. during the said war around 700 thousand palestinian arabs were displaced, that was 85% of the total palestinian arab. islamic republican of iran's proposal, the united nations endorse two state solution back for american and european support and trump's initiative, notably trump's plan, although without any international backing presents a stark departure from established un resolutions marking it as unilateral endeavor focused on disrupting the palestinian landescape and wider. dynamics and resolution 194 defined principles for reaching a final settlement and returning palestinian refugees to their homes. article 11 of the resolution resolves that refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbors should be permitted to so the earliest practicable date and that compensation should be paid for property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which under principles of international law or equity should be made good but governments or authorities responsible. the resolution also calls for the establishment of the united nations conciliation commission to facilitate peace between israel and arab states continuing the efforts of un mediator falk bernadot following his assassination. well that hasn't gone too well. in fact, given israel never stopped taking from palestinians, it would hardly want to compensate them properly what's lost. no surprise as it is. is an occupying force. zinius jews crept up as early as the mid-1900 and now as israel they continue their occupation guns ablazing. iran's proposed referendum stresses how it is first opposed to occupation, racism, war and insecurity. second, its main angle is the participation and opinion of the people of palestine. third, it is based on the legal principle of self-determination, and fourth, it is realistic and practicable. to the islamic republic of iran, palestine is not a tactical matter, rather it is ideological and humanitarian, yard stick of commitment to humane principles or opposition to them. palestine is in fact the embodiment of the pain commonly suck from cruelty, transgression and colonialism. all for today, thank you for watch from the whole team, please do tune in, saint times next. and each week after, don't forget to leave your comments and topic requests, you can also follow us on facebook, instagram and twitter via@eran today show, till next time, take care, let us make it clear from the beginning, the us veto at the unc for immediate cease fire makes it complicit in the carnage in gaza. as bombs continue to rain down on palestinian civilians and cause widespread destruction, the us has once again used its power to block any attempt by the united nations security council to demand sease fire in gaza. by vetoing this resolution, the us stands alone and casting its vote against humanity. once again, the nsc has failed by refusing to genuinely commit to serious negotiations and by allowing a war mungering empire to stop any efforts at relieving the palestinians from more suffering. the crisis in gaza will only get worse and runs the risk of extending. us veto seesfire this week on the midd stream. that lines palestinian health officials say israeli forces are targeting hospitals and firing at patient rooms as the regime's genocidal war enters 69th day. the united nations warns at gaz is facing a public health disaster due to the collapse of the system and the spread of disease. speaking to presy a senior hamas official says the movement won't give up resistance against and is ready for. long war in gaza.
Related Keywords