Specially the way it has been shifting during the last 3 years. They know that. Has told them so many lies about whats going on in the region in the middle east in syria in yemen. They know theyre there. But they know what the truth so i think its time to talk about this truth 3rd i mean so many interviews with the media. They dont try to get the information they try to get the scoop. They dont try to object have to do to bring the audience whats happening in the world thats why i stopped doing interviews for 4 youth well look it will be a journey from damascus to reconstruction but how many civilians how many soldiers have been killed wounded. Or displaced from your country. Just 20 level. That you so during the last 24 hours in damascus you see you arrive to to damascus is the result of the sacrifice of more than 100000 syrian soldiers who are martyred whole war and so many lives of course its along the 1000 or maybe tens of thousands of civilians or innocence whove been killed by mortars by excused by being. Kidnapped and killed later or disappeared we their families still waiting for theirs there was a lot of likely fight in the face of those terrorists thats why you see these stability and reconstruction countries that have supported you include iran of course russia. I mean i want to get on in a bit to the british and american defacto backing for isis alqaeda in your country but how would you what would you say to a russian family that had lost a russian soldier who had risked sacrificed their life. For for a dictator for a release dictator what would you say to them as to why. Glad to be uprooted should be sending in soldiers to help your government you mention very important point even in theory no one would die for a person people would die especially as for cause and this cause the defending of their country think in their existence their future. Little somebody coming from another country could a 4th person whether hes a dictator or whatever you want to call it so this is not realistic this is again delusion that somebody would come from because the president put his name to die for another person or even. President put him put to put all the interest of his country. For one person this is against the logic actually of russia according to what they said i mean president putin level and the others they are defending their interest in different ways one aspect if they defend or if they fight terrorism in another country with a serial in any other country in the region that we defend the russian people because terrorism and least i do it is he has no borders they dont see political border with its one. Its the one area. The whole world is one of you know for the terrorism secondly the implement in the door the International Law. For according to their point of view this International Law if its implemented its in correlation with their interests with the National Interest so implementing the International Law around the wood will help the interest of the russian people for what theyve been. Doing in accordance with their passionate interest with the global therapeutic and with the syrian interest in syria stop it now you know that in media and nato countries this country your government you personally are synonymous with chemical weapons attacks lets just go back to one in 21st of august 23rd team. In goods did your government drop chemical weapons on the. On that day 21st august 2030 the funny thing about the identity of the same date where the 1st delegation that wants to investigate International Dedication that came to syria to investigate the youth it didnt arrive to damascus which is only a few kilometers from this police. Logically the syrian army if. If we support that he has Chemical Plant he wants to do that he wouldnt do the this for a 2nd. They talk about 200 civilian killed if you use chemical weapons you me you me kill tens of 1000 in such area with People Living very close to each other i mean its crowded area 3rd that is that it only existed in the mind of the western off the narrative that was that the pretext to attack syria the thats what i mean they didnt offer any tangible evidence to prove that there was such attacks and they are there were many reports that all that refute that has refuted that report all those allegations so it was all the allegation never ever theon army use chemical weapons before he handed over all his arsenal to the International Committee of course of the decision then to invade the o. P. C. W. Him to remove chemical weapons or to actually win when there were such allegations about the syrian army during 40 so really you ought to raise that obesity w. Wanted you to ride 40 into it we invited them to come we did it of we invited them to come because we told them you could come and should investigate because we were short under perth and through the already cations but of course the delegation of all with. As you know they are mostly biased well i mean the present obesity w. Had for them to arrive as he may have his own problems with whistle blower as. There is no doubt though that. He was the director general of the obesity i believe the board of. The destruction here he said there were gaps of certainties discrepancies in europe b c w wanted to destruction of chemical weapons here in this culture gap in our reports why dont they show it now its been since 2013 weve been hearing the same allegations couldnt be prove it after 6 years and every time they see syria has used chemical weapons is it possible to do to be under this. Supervision by the whole western world and were going to use it again and again this is not rational i mean the whole story we do we dont need it we are advancing i mean every time we talk about using chemical weapons it was when we advise not when we lose i mean even militarily you may use if you want to use such a weapon as a model called the syrian army because we dont have it anymore but really logically you can use it when you are losing ground not when your advancing so you deny the use in job. In the area of aleppo. You presumably did i thought they were able to add a 70 all of these you deny the use of chemical weapons by the syrian every story worth nothing more than a geisha the one who said there was use of chemical weapons he the one who should prove his story hed want to should offer evidence is that you speak with the c. W. Did. Lead britain and the United States and for us to believe. They needed to bomb your country on the basis of they really do believe both. Believe is one thing and bringing evidence is another thing so were talking about evidence what the evidence that they have. To prove their story nothing they have nothing that can be any truth in the room was arguably on your side saying Video Evidence has been manipulated in that rebels were using chemical weapons via the Saudi Arabian government and chemical weapons were indeed used but by the socalled rebels. On the you tube you can see it i mean the stage play fully with somebody. Play the role of the victim in many incidents not only with chemical weapons even with bombardments they. Believe that somebody has been the victim then at the end of the shooting his normal person here stand up. And you can see it on you tube its very clear we can offer you would be evidence for this but theres no other evidence beyond that because the white helmet supported by the British ForeignOffice Government recently been given extra funding for the trumpet ministration. They claim their videos are absolutely true and that in fact the people who are making those videos saved 150000 lives in your country which would you agee again is very simple to see the same faces of those angels. The white head meant the same face of the same one in the white helmet was a fighter with clyde. You can see me very clear the same one always been behaving. Or. Cutting hate and one of them would be eating the heart of a soldier i mean this is very common to see on the internet the evidence i mean no one in the in this region believe the stunt the p. R. Stunt of the whitehead myth they are offshoot of. Well the u. K. Statement dated b. B. C. And was the international of their religion your government killed 11000 people using socalled barrel bombs from 12 that would be a violation of Un Security Council resolution you want 3000000 and indeed Human Rights Watch is pointing to satellite imagery youre talking about you tube videos saying theyre fake viewers these are some of the major nations as biggest n. G. O. S and broadcasters no war is a good war. This is selfevident truth you always. Victims in any war but the talk about an army or state to go in killed 3000000000 and its own people this is not realistic for the simple reason the war in syria was about capturing the hearts of the people and you cannot capture the heart of the people by bombarding. The syrian army with fighting the terrorists. Whether there is a. Fire that affected from tyranny and that could have happened and you can have investigations but how could the Syrian People support this state and their president and theyre all me if they are killing them. Was the only way. Regained east aleppo. The joke of wonders for you personally authorize the only way to get rid of al qaeda. Arguably backed by britain and the United States the only way to get rid of them was aerial bombardment we definitely and we succeeded in some area through we we captured without war we made negotiations with those groups and they left they left that area and then we need to produce in the pictures and we presume we say those pictures are true of the destruction in east aleppo because that really the only way to defeat al qaeda is the groups. Those groups in eastern alipore used to bombard the civilians on daily basis and kill. Hundreds of thousands of people in aleppo so the mission of the army and the mission of the heat is to protect the civilians from those terrorists how can we do that without attacking the terrorists that small children media and later nations they should bear in your defense but what about the use of double tap strikes by the Syrian Desert and the Russian Air Force where you bomb part of east aleppo and then emergency workers go in when you bomb again there are a lot of. Negative misleading narrative in there with your to show that the syrian army is intentionally killing this event without no reason and to show that those that they called them. Like a y. Tell me any other hospital which is paid a quarter for the terrorists the theory that the syrian army is only attacking the humanitarian facilities in order for the civilians to suffer actually what happened you drop of the both civilians fled both area and came to the government side in every place not only just in aleppo. Those people if you go to pull this deal even be in those areas under the supervision of the government why didnt we kill them why didnt they fled to turkey. This is you know if you would there was not a thing of but as i said great son of the head of the british back when talmud spoke on my program and said they are just a humanitarian organization not terrorists a tool despite what you and the russian government allege but you but you have pictures you have to do you have proof so its not we we dont have any of the allegations how do we know through their images we we can offer you all the evidence we have if it is. Mr president ill stop you there more from president Bashar Al Assad of syria after this break. Were going to fulfill your promises apologise to the people. You know weve all pots. You want to 1st. Know 5. Oh yeah. Welcome back youre watching an ati International Exclusive with the president Bashar Al Assad of syria im going back a little to the 1st demonstrations in. Damascus and there is a famous game we see state mandated british Media Program in which they interviewed of all people well the germ of the druze in beirut who said to you authorize the killing of the year old hamza. Is that true and that they didnt interviewed a succession of people seeing the mistakes you made led to what happened it wasnt the british and american backing of alqaeda and i says day in your country at the very beginning. Doing a bit it was rationed during the 1st 2 days we lost 5 policemen. By shooting by bullets how could we talk about Peaceful Demonstrations. Why do you have a. Listening kid. But how could i want to raise the killing of a 13 year old yeah im just starting from a very good from for the very beginning and the word Peaceful Demonstrations wasnt correct there was hooting and you cannot there who is hooting at the police and who the one was hooting at the civilians because in most of the incidents the police didnt have even machine gun or if that this child was tortured no thats not true hes not we never had a cigarette burn there was one of the he was killed and he was killed he was kid and the other legation but he was tortured he wasnt tortured he was killed and was taken to the hospital and i met with his parents may have been or the read story this is only in the with in the west and in the with a media outlet that is not the story syria so thats why im so proud of all those the 3 that are completely disconnected from our reality hes somebody who died how did he die who shot but i do know it was killed when you have a chaotic demonstrations anyone could be infiltrated by demonstration and start shooting in Different Directions and kill police in order to retaliate. Or vice versa should have you heard who. Have been arrested in germany the germans alleging something called broadchurch 2511 of your torture units to torture demonstrators we dont have torture unit we dont have for torture policy in syria what why do you use the torture for but the question why is this a call if you could situation you just want to torture people of this kind of. Way to torture you need information f. B. I. Or the information the measured it all the ceiling people supported their government thats why weve been here for 9 years in spite. All of this aggression by the with and by the petrodollar in the. Thats why the sword on your teeth and so why do you put to the people but the question is not what is it if you talk about individual it is it is this is the only individual incident that could happen by anyone for revenge for any other reason that could happen anywhere and board but we dont have such policy we never believe in that torture could make your situation better as a state very simple so we dont we dont know what did you make of it when the British Government sent the royal navy to intercept in the rain the universal. They said the iranian government said it was with heating oil. For syria and the sections from the European Union going to hit the poorest people of syria. This winter. Exactly 1st for this is by receiving. The biography by the United Kingdom regime and this is the core meaning of the word regime called regime in polythene gang of youth something similar. Yes they wanted to effect the people in syria why because those people expected to rule to rule with against their government during the difference to just over the war but they did and they were supposed to be supporting the terrorists the moderate rebels with the angels of white helmet but the people didnt this with their government so they have to suffer they have to pay the price 1st for they have to learn the lesson that you should stood with their agenda 2nd this is maybe the last ditch attempt in order to push them to be against Big Government but they try to plow through winter to try to before and they didnt work because the people knew the whole story and they know where their interests lie. People in the global so. You and your government ministers may think its natural to accuse the age of governments of supporting al qaeda bases but view is watching this interview in those major countries may think this is ridiculous why would the British Government say or the obama government because i suppose dont trump arguably has suddenly realised what may have been going on why do you think they wanted to support al qaeda and i says why because of the fact this started with the fact that the american officers before anyone else said verb are you with that on like john kerry like Hillary Clinton and many others when they talked about their role in supporting of clyde in afghanistan in order to be a tool against the soviet union that this is this is their modus operandi its not something we invented that is on 911. 00 why would they make the same mistake again because the american policy in general. Depends on trial of. The invaded of against they got nothing to invade iraq because nothing and they started to invade other countries but in different way they change their way the problem the left is now the the fighters survival war from their point of view they are losing losing their hegemony so they want to fight the russian the iranian dissident whoever said no even their allies of this ignore like that with some government they will fight with them they need dude they notice that in iraq it didnt work by sending the army theyd asked a lot and they paid the price even when inside the United States so its much easier for them to send a proxy so al qaeda is a proxy again the Syrian Government again the russian government and the government best buy theyve been using this but you have evidence the ice is how did i says rise suddenly in 2014 out of nowhere of course nothing. In iraq and syria at the same time with american armament. The be physically how could they smuggle millions of barrels of oil to turkey under the supervision of the american aircraft how could an american wanted to use them against the syrian army so its more thumping with it the american said that and the fact that the same story. But while this has been going on you have been talk