to your, to your right, my left and, yeah, right along those curtains. and while not necessary to provide public comment, we do invite you to fill out a comment card and leave them on the tray by the television to your left, by the doors, if you wish to be accurately recorded for the minutes. should you have any documents to be included as part of the file, this should be submitted to myself, the clerk, alternatively, you may submit public comment in writing in either of the following ways. he mailed them to myself, the budget and finance committee clerk at birx entj a l i p a at sf gov. org if you submit public comment via email, it will be forwarded to the supervisors and also included as part of the official file. you may also send your written comments via us postal service to our office on city hall at one. doctor carlton, be good to place room 244, san francisco, california 94 102. and finally, madam chair, due to the due to the memorial day holiday, items acted upon today are expected to appear on the board of supervisors agenda of june 4th unless otherwise stated. madam chair. thank you, mr. clerk. and before i call the items, to on today's agenda, a reminder that for items that have budget and legislative analyst report, we will go to the department presentation and the then the budget legislative analyst report and then questions and then public comment. so with that mr. clerk, please call item number one and two together. yes, madam chair items. item numbers one and two are resolutions approving and authorizing the director of property to execute a, to execute lease agreements with the trinity center, llc, located at 1145 market street, the leases will be effective upon approval of the respective resolutions and authorizing the director of property to execute any amendments, made certain modifications, and take certain actions that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities to the city, and also do not materially decrease the benefits to the city in our necessary or advisable to effectuate the purposes of the leases or resolutions. item number one is on behalf of the law library for the term of 15 years, with one five year option at a base rent of 599,000 per year, with 3% annual rent increases and a partial market reset in year 11. item number two is on behalf of the health service system, to lease a portion, to lease of a portion of the real property, for an initial term of ten years with one five year auction, extension option to renew at an initial annual base rent of approximately 589,000, with 3% annual increases. madam chair. thank you, mr. clerk. colleagues, we have heard this these two items, last week and it was continued due to amendments that, in effect, adding the dollar amount corrected on the actual legislation as well as, the term, the years of and option, on these leases. so, i don't know if it requires extensive discussion today. i don't see any name on the roster. would it be okay if i just go to public comments on these two items i see nodding? let's go to public comments on these items. yes, madam chair, we now invite members of the public have joined us today who wish to speak on these items. one and two, to line up, to speak now along those windows, when you come forward to the lectern, all speakers will have two minutes to speak. madam chair, we have no speakers. thank you. seeing no public comments, public comment is now closed. and with that, i would like to move these two items to full board with recommendation, a roll call, please. and on that motion to forward, both resolutions to the full board with a positive recommendation, vice chair mandelman mandelman i. member. melgar. melgar i chair chan i chan i we have three eyes. thank you. and the motion passes. and with that, mr. clark, please call item number three. yes. item number three is a resolution approving the harvey milk terminal one museum store lease, between love from usa group, inc. and the city and county acting buying through its airport commission for a term of seven years with two one year options and a minimum annual guarantee of 205,000 for the first year of the lease to commence upon approval by the board of supervisors. madam chair, thank you. today we have sfo, our san francisco airport here. good morning, supervisors. the airport is seeking your approval for a new concession lease in harvey milk terminal one with love from usa group inc. for a lease term of seven years, with two one year options to extend this lease results from a competitive request for proposals. process love from usa group inc. was the sole proposer and their proposal was found to be both responsive and responsible. love from usa group is a women owned, established 100% airport concession, decent managed business enterprise with more than 45 years of retail experience. the store will feature merchandise from local bay area museums, including the asian art museum, contemporary jewish museum, museum of the african diaspora, and the california academy of sciences. there is no bla report as it did not reach the threshold requirement, and i'm happy to answer any questions. thank you, we don't have any questions. we appreciate this work. we understand, we appreciate the guarantees always. and with that, let's go to public comment on this item. yes. members of the public who wish to address this committee regarding this item number three, now's your opportunity to step up to the lectern. madam chair, we have no speakers seeing no public comments. public comment is now closed. i would like to make the motion. i make the motion to move this item to full board with recommendation and a roll call, please. and on that motion to forward to the full board with a positive recommendation, vice chair mandelman mandelman i member melgar melgar i. chair chan i chan i we have three eyes. thank you and the motion passes. and with that, mr. clerk, please call item number four. yes. item number four is a resolution approving amendment number three to the terminal three. coffee and quick serve concession lease between elevate gourmet brands inc and aim high esg, llc. a joint venture doing business as elevate gourmet brands, sfo group and the stanton county. acting by and through its airport commission for the removal of the sf mac and cheese kitchen facility from the lease reimbursement of approximately 279,000 to the tenant for unamortized construction costs relating to the sf mac and cheese kitchen facility and reduction of the minimum annual guarantee from 375,000 to 185,000, and the annual promotion charge from approximately 2000 to 405 to reflect the reduction in the square footage of the remaining premises of the lease, effective upon approval of this resolution, with no change to the term of march 11th, 2019 through september 30th, 2031. madam chair, thank you. and again, this is for san francisco airport. and this one actually has a bla report. yes good morning, deanna bullock again with sfo. the airport is seeking your approval for the third amendment to the concession lease with elevate gourmet brands sfo group. the proposed amendment would remove san francisco mac and cheese kitchen from the lease, reimbursed 279,627 to the tenant for unamortized construction costs and reduce the minimum annual guarantee from 375,000 to 185,000, and the annual promotion charge from 1991 to 405. the original lease was approved by the board of supervisors in february 2019 for two facilities and a term of eight years, with two one year options to extend the first location opened on march 12th, 2020. unfortunately, construction on the second location, sf mac and cheese kitchen, had just started when the pandemic began and has been suspended since. the airport would like to recapture the location for use in connection with the terminal three west modernization project, specifically for use by united airlines. the airport anticipates receiving approximately $90,850 per year in increased rent from united airlines for the premises. the budget analyst has reviewed the proposed amendment and recommends approval, and i'm also happy to answer questions. good morning, supervisors. nick menard from the budget legislative analyst office. item four is a resolution that amends an airport concession lease to remove one of the tenants in a restaurant premises and terminal two. the restaurant never opened, and so the amendment removes them from the premises, reduces the minimum guaranteed rent from 375 to $185,000 a year, and also has the airport paying $279,000 of tenant improvement work that was undertaken in by the tenant that benefited the airport, but that was never able to be able to be recuperated because that restaurant never opened. we detailed the changes on page eight of our report, and we note that this is a revenue loss of $1.3 million to the airport over the remaining term of the lease that is partially offset by the increased rent from united airlines. we recommend approval of item four. thank you, thank you. and we understand this change, and i'm glad that we can capture with united airlines in this space and be able to even out with the, rent. and so i don't see any name on the roster . we'll go to public comment on this item. yes. members of the public who wish to address this committee regarding this item number four, please step up to the lectern and you'll be given two minutes. madam chair, we have no speakers. thank you. seeing no public comments. public comment is now closed. colleagues i would like to move this item to full board with recommendation and a roll call, please. and on that motion to forward this resolution to the full board with a positive recommendation, vice chair mandelman mandelman i member melgar melgar i chair chan chan i. we have three eyes. thank you. and the motion passes. thank you. and i just wanted to say we hope you will be able to enjoy the wag brigade today, as they are here from 10 a.m. to 230. in case you need any doggy cuddles. so thank you so much. room 278. room 278. thank you. forward to it, and with that, mr. clerk, please call item number five. yes. item number five is a resolution authorizing adoption of the san francisco mental health services act. three year program and expenditure, or integrated plan for fiscal years 2023 through 2026. madam chair, thank you. and today we have our department of public health. it's quite a long title. the office of justice, equity, diversity and inclusion, behavioral health services. yes. thank you. thank you. supervisors, hello. my name is jessica brown. as i stated, i'm the director of the office of justice, equity, diversity and inclusion and the behavioral health services act. i am here today to present to you the three year integrated plan for fiscal year 2324 through fiscal year 24, 2526. i just want to advise that this plan was developed prior to prop one passing. and so during this presentation, we'll do an overview of the mental health services act. you'll hear me interchangeably say that name. and then we'll also get into some details about how prop one is going to impact and what our plan is. so thank you. so again overview of mental health services act going over our 2122 selected outcomes as well as our plans for the next fiscal or for this fiscal year, as well as just our integrated plan overall. and then again, reviewing prop one. so the mental health services act, now known as the behavioral health services act, was enacted into law in 2005. it is a 1% tax on personal income, over $1 million to allow counties to transform mental health services to really address the unmet needs of our vulnerable populations. it's a way to also provide culturally responsive care and also support peers with lived experiences to be able to be into our system of behavioral health and it's based off a set of core principles. those principles have to deal with not only providing wraparound services for families, but also cultural competency. prior to prop one, we have five funding components of the mental health services act. those funding components are allocated and mandated by the state, where the state will allocate funding into each of those. those buckets that you're seeing. the first is community services and supports, which really focuses on, mental health and substance use services for co-occurring conditions. it looks at full service partnerships and also to it provides support for peers with vocational training, peer support services and housing. the second category is innovations. and this this category allows us to, pilot and test innovative mental health programs that are culturally responsive to the unmet needs of our clients. the third category is prevention and early intervention, which focuses on population focused programs as well as prevention and early interventions for mental health support. and the last two categories are workforce education and training, and also capital facilities and technology needs, although we have five mandated funding categories, san francisco actually divides up those funding categories into service categories to allow us to be better, to serve and provide a wide variety of programing to our clients. and i'll get a little bit more into that. i wanted to go over the funding components because they have changed what, prop one. but just to give you a landscape of where we're at now, prior to prop one, we had five into prop one. we're going down from 5 to 3. and i'll explain a little bit more about that in a minute, so here are some of our, outcomes, what we did in the fiscal year 2122 is sustain a lot of our current programs and services that really support population focused programs. we expanded our funding to include pilot programs such as our culturally congruent program with our civil service clinics that focus on black african american clients, as well as providing culturally affirming patient navigation support at our chinatown north north beach clinic, we also developed a request for proposal to provide, mental health services for, post, post and pre, pre and postpartum birthing people. and so we're working with four of our community based organizations to start within the next fiscal year. those services for birthing people. we also partnered with the human rights commission to provide talk therapy services for black african american clients throughout san francisco, and then we also to ensure that we were continuing, as i mentioned, our population focused programs, in addition, we have our peer specialists certification program, where we created with rams, our one of our cbos, to be able to provide our peers with training to, support medi-cal billing as well in our peer programs. and so that was another program that was launched. so far, we have funded 258 peers in fiscal year 21, 20, 2122, throughout our behavioral health systems, just wanted to go over real quickly about how we evaluate our programs. we are mandated by the state to provide an annual update and also a three year plan. that three year plan does. and the annual update does consist of demographics and narratives on how our programs are doing. we have mid-year and year end reports that we require all of our cbos to provide to us so that we can evaluate the programs also to we provide technical assistance through our contract negotiation process, to better support our programs as they're implementing their their , their interventions. these are just some of our outcomes, giving you all some percentages for how our full service partnerships, outcomes were. we had 86% decrease in arrests for, older adults that had participated in the full service partnership. we also had an 87% decrease in mental health and substance use disorder emergencies for adults. our population focus programs, we saw a significant impact in 90% of our 97% of our client s, increased their quality of life as feeling better, also to participating in more therapeutic services. 80% of our older adult clients also attending some of our senior, drop in in center activities in which reported an increase in socialization. and then we also had 100% of our, our peers that graduated from our vocational programs with our ability. again, each year we are required and this again, prior to prop one, we were required to present a three year plan to you all to for board approval to submit to the department of health care services, this three year plan again just looks into everything that we've done over the last three years and also includes the community feedback we've conducted nine, 16, community engagement meetings across the city with over 165 individuals, to understand the needs and also to get community participation in how we were implementing some of our mental health programs. so some of the spotlight of our program, would be, as, as our community faces a variety of crisis and mental health and overdose and homelessness concerns, images say has been very committed to being a part of san francisco's mental health system to really transform and provide mental health needs to all san francisco, san franciscan, who lack insurance and also are experiencing homelessness. we provide 51% of our funding to address serious mental health and co-occurring substance use. we also provide comprehensive housing to meet the better needs of unhoused individuals and also we again, as i mentioned earlier, have a lot of population focused programs that address racism and equity issues as well, so this is, again, looking forward into 2000 to fiscal year 2526, some of our programs, again, include improving the mental health needs for pre and postpartum clients, working with homeless children's network. then continuing our kumba peer fellowship and also again launching our culturally responsive programs within our civil service clinics. we have, innovation programs that are launched at four of our civil service clinics south of market omi, our tech clinic, and also to our mission mental health alternatives program. and so we're going to continue to will be continuing to really expand on our full service partnerships, especially with the new proposition one requirements. so this just gives you an overview of our budget and our proposed budget that's going to be in our three year plan, i just want to just iterate to you all that we are 13% of the overall behavioral health service budget, and our funding is very volatile because we rely on the taxpayers. our funding can fluctuate from year to year, so this gives you a breakdown of all the different funding categories. the five that i mentioned earlier and how much funding we did put into it, what our expenditures were for actual fiscal year 2324, and then what our estimated expenditures will be for the following years. again, this was created prior to prop one. so that is going to change a bit with the new requirement points, and again i wanted to just give you an overview of our revenue. we did see a significant increase in our revenue in fiscal year 2324. but as the years are going, we are seeing a significant fall in the budget. again, that is because of the funding being volatile. we do get a state projection from our state financial forecaster, mike geis, that let's all counties know how our budget is going to do. we're going to be meeting with him and believe in july to get more insight of where our budget will be at. but these are the these are the projections as of now. this gives you all an overview of our unspent balance and where we're at, again, our funding, we do project out three years with the three year plan. some of this funding will show an unspent balance, that we are accounting for as we allocated for our prudent reserve that's mandated by the state. we also do an internal reserve just to be able to have a little bit of cushion for any economic downfall or downturn. and we also keep that internal reserve in the event that we are not gettin
Related Keywords