Space station on its First Mission under nasa contract. To the a big boost rocket company, and from rockets to drones. Google is gearing up with drones theew mexico, to deliver internet in rural areas, also investing 15 million in research and Development Labs in new mexico. Lead, the latest , ite operating system, ios8 an update. To be but they are crashing. Mobile phones, having trouble processing. The Health Care App due to a buzz. And our reporter, world research. You. Will start with what exactly is happening . 6, and it hasone been fine so far. It is about 60 more than your whole workforce working on something, you may want to wait for an update or a two. A microsoft release. In particular . Facebook has had a lot of crashing problems. Ropbox, and you will see the updates rolling out. The new ios has about 4000 new features. I think this is what developers have struggled with. Somed you have got research out showing that samsung is losing a lot of people to apple and the iphone. What have you found . Last week, late last week, we surveyed a population online to see about the folks who were going to be buying the iphone, and we found that 27 of people who currently own a samsung are actually going to make the jump over to the iphone at this point, and that is surprising for to reasons. One is that samsung has a nice set of programs. Even with things being so loud, the iphone 6 is clearly the next factor. Surprised by the defection from samsung. A note with a bigger screen. Maybe using it in the same way . And helps make that switch a little bit painless. There is the coolness factor that apple has. This is a musthave phone. What about the current ios issues . Was withr one they had the health kid, the fitness tracking. That was never even released. They found it before he was put out by the public, and they are hoping to have that by the end of the month. More upgrades available. You wrote this wonderful story about the bug team which was like a swat team to fix any problems as soon as they appear, and this rash of problems. I am just try to put it a little bit into perspective. It is 3. 6 in the big picture of all of the apps. That my facebook app on my old phone mine was not working. Was yours working . Mine was crashing. I stayed off facebook for a while, basically. These are apps that certainly people use very, very frequently, so any problem they and some big one, developers have been not too pleased with it. Facetious, but i wonder if some of those Companies Working on the iphone, if it is a material part of their business for revenue, they might be facing some headwind. You have got to reverse it, as well, in that a lot of developers raced to get out with the latest software, and, perhaps, dont do all of the crossing the ts and lower case js. Is it a developer issue . I think it is probably both. This was a big release for developers. More than 4000 different tools that they needed, and if everything is not working properly, then this will happen. All right, from bloomberg news, and with new research out from mcnealy, and lets turn to of management shakeup at one the largest enterprise companies. Oracle has just released a proxy statement, describing a leadership change at Larry Ellison steps down as ceo and others share the role. Covers oracle, and, wek, what exactly new did learn about this relationship between them today . Well, not only has there been a huge leadership change, but the performance stock units, that means they need to get a good amount of operating cash flow compared to many of oracles rivals in the business world, and that will contribute directly to their compensation. Also, Larry Ellison is under the same schema now. A big change. They are herding cats over there. Have you heard that question mark i wanted to say it. They have been herding cats for a long time. Person to herd, i am sure. And the thing that jumped out to me is they are both making a lot less than the previous year, but still more than pretty much anyone else in technology and corporate america. Return. It seems like a oracle has been under shareholder pressure for several years now to reduce the amount of compensation it pays its executives. That has been seen as being very, very lavish, sent to bring oracle back to the level of other companies while still making them extremely wealthy. Lets talk a little bit about be paid more than her. I know it is not that much more. He is cfo, and she is not. Noticeable, particularly when they have this issue. She has been there since 1999. Indeed, she has, and she has done a heck of a job. A 2000 difference when we are talking about 37 million. We are talking about principle. Yes, we are, and their salary and their bonus is the same, but it is mostly stock compensation, but i think the bigger issue is just how big these numbers are. When you look across some other companies who pay their ceos iss and tons of money, this tons and tons and a couple extra times. That is the thing here. Jack, you have said that some people have complained about this as shareholders, and shareholders also get a vote on this, and they have repeatedly voted for the leadership they have provided for the company. Voted, have repeatedly but you can like the leader while also saying i think you a bit too much from the accounts that your company is generating. I think that is what is going on here. In many senses, oracle executives to make significant amounts of money, and i think by canng performance, they make it feel more fair to the shareholders, and they can still make the money, tied directly to the oracle performance. Is there anyone else out there besides me that is saying why is she not getting paid more or at least as much . Is 2000. Of an extremely large pot. I think there is something obscure and strange there. Fundamentally, what this is about, and this is an interesting thing, a lot of salary,s, a one dollar and there is lots of other stuff, and meg whitman is one who comes to mind, taking tons in compensation and bonuses, and what we see here is other compensation, and quite often i can lead to Something Like use of a private jet or insurance to an executive or security for which larryfor ellison was provided more than 1 million last year. More, but their salaries and their bonuses were exactly the same. All right, jack clark who covers oracle for us and cory johnson, as well. Google added a organization that denies Climate Change as a real problem. And be sure to catch my interview with the oracle ceo tv, a firstoomberg crack at them as they unveiled a new phone. Welcome back to bloomberg west. I am emily chang. President obama addressing Climate Change, and Aaron Schmidt admitting it was some sort of a miss they to give support to an Exchange Council which opposes u. S. Action on Climate Change. Your organization protested the google involvement. What you make of the statement of eric schmidt today . Wronghink it was the thing for google to be doing. May were not aligned. We are very encouraged. It makes sense to me that they would support it. It makes sense to me that exxon ec, but it doesal not make sense that google is getting involved with the group that is opposing Climate Change. Why is google involved . That is a Great Questions for google. You have been suggesting they ended that relationship. Youre a company that wants c isave interests, and ale an organization you probably think about. But the problem from our perspective is while they may align on some policy, like immigration policy, trade policy, or other kinds of things, they are off when it comes to Climate Change, and the good news today from google is that they have put Climate Change high enough up on their list that they have disaffiliated from the group. Google has ended its as aionship with alec result of leftleaning associations. How do you respond to that . The american legislative Exchange Council has not been shy about their position on Climate Change. The draftk back at legislation may proposed in 2009, it suggested keeping Climate Change as a theory around the country. About free market. That is about misinformation. And google, of course, recognizes that. Does this go beyond this . Are there other things that google is doing in statehouses to support Climate Change deniers . Google as well as others are heavily invested in the initical contribution washington, d. C. , so google, for example, contributed to Climate Change deniers in congress. So there are 2008, additional steps that need to be taken. They were very clear that they need to make sure that they need to align with that view. And they have not had time to get back to us. Beyond. On twitter and all right, thanks so much for joining us. Thank you. Spaces biggest stars with jeff bezos and elon musk. Next. Welcome back to bloomberg west. I am emily chang. Spacex has docked at the International Space station, with a 3d printer and even 20 mice who will live up in space for research purposes. Resupply mission under the spacex contract with nasa. Musk will have company. The Jeff Bezos Company announced a government contract of its own, in partner with an alliance to develop an engine for its rockets for space, and it pits the two tech titans against each other, and what impact will jeff bezos have on the future of space . Joining me is the former captain of the International Space station himself, and, chris, you have experience in this space with the dragon cap phil. You have met jeff bezos and elon musk. I think it is a really good set of circumstances. What we need more than anything else is better engines. Our engineimited by technology, trying to safely get to space and then trying to get even further in the universe, and we have just been making small modifications to existing engines, and that is really what both of these two organizations are working on, and that is what nasa is helping to pay for, better engines, and i am excited that some of the best entrepreneurs of our time are working on this. Huget they are also competitors. Can you explain who is doing what and who might be doing what better . Sure. The engine that jeff bezos and his people are working on in partnership with the united launch alliance, a are looking at cutting their reliance on a russian engine that we have been sort of partnering and subcontracting and using for several years. At anre looking americanmade nextgeneration type of engine, and jeff has brilliant people working for him, so they are really working on that piece. On the other side, spacex, elon musk, they have not only built a new rocket ship, but they are building spacious, as well, and it is like the one that just a docked at the station, as you mentioned. But what elon musk is looking at is how to make a launch rocket reusable. Rockets beenhe obvious that light come around and land again, and if he can successfully do that, then he will cut the cost factor of 10, maybe a factor of 100. Both of them are going to take us in the direction we want to go, so i think occultation computation competition is great. Talk to me about what that means in terms of opening up the sort of idea sharing between all four of these companies. Iswell, the real difference has toldst, nasa companies what to build, and they built it for them. Now, nasa is saying this is the product we want. You can build anything you want. It is the difference between holding a car in renting a car, and that allows a lot of freedom, and we have got a couple of different camps is ating, which i think good idea, and i think the way nasa has done it is good for the nation. And hopefully we will not end up with just one winner but two different ways to get to the station. We have only had one way to get people to and from the space station, which is never a safe carton of eggs to have all of your locked in, like we have been doing for, gosh, the last three or four years. In your experience having worked with the spacex and dragon, anything related to safety, perhaps, that is different than just nasa . Of the i sat on top rocketship, you are counting on tens of thousands of people that you have never met, and little companies that help build all of the parts, companies you have never had the chance to visit. That is why you need a really good, strict set of rules. You need oversight, requirements, and then you need to make sure that that vehicle you are writing it is tested properly, so there is always that concern. Test pilots and astronauts are passengers. They will be very involved. We have to leave it there, a former commander of the International Space station, thanks so much. , would refocus on technology and the future. Be given aarch giant green light on this from the fcc . A warmer Equity Analyst and our bloomberg contributing editor, and joining us from melbourne, companya, a ceo with a working with drones themselves, so, chris, what do you make of the fact that they want to build these drones in new mexico . It looks like chris is having some problems hearing us. Paul, what about you . Space forst another google trying to be involved in drones . There was the idea of using balloons to create a mesh fabric for Wireless Networks in underserviced areas. Know, the problem is that the drones, in particular, the balloons have this idea that they stay up, and drones do not. I have a tendency to fall from and we have not done well so far in creating longlasting drones. It is interesting to see how you create even a qualified permanent one. And is a longterm project. It is a risky project, but this other project, we have not heard a lot about it. That balloonw how project is actually going . A little bit. We know that initially there was this for wifing specifically, and then we figured out that that was not working well for hosting and power reasons, and they have gone to using the sort of latest Generation Cellular technology than most of us are using on our andoids and iphones, lte, willis continuing, but we see wireless cars before we see the balloons. Trying to provide internet everywhere, who wins . Google or facebook or someone else . I am not sure what they are winning here. Causing eachgoogle other to spend an inordinate amount of money, but my guess is that google is probably in a better position to do this just because they have been doing these risky projects for some time. I think the bigger question is is is really just in service of bringing connectivity to underserved areas, or is there really Something Else going on here . And, again, iion, think google is in a better position to and if it from this. Lets bring back in the ceo of another drug company. What do you make of this . Delivery drones. Now it is internetproviding drones. Be successful can google here . The fact that all of these Big Companies are getting into the drone industry, it is extremely valuable for any of the startups that are actually working and building products. Think that on the wifi axis side of things, there is the equipment required to actually make that possible. It is heavier than what you would need for data collection, for image collection, for but there isllite, one company that could solve it. To actually invest in technology to create new things, miniaturized Wifi Technology and put it in the air. This is mostly banned in the united states. Do you see regulation catching up with what these businesses, google and amazon, what they want to do . We have been working closely with the faa. We just filed to work companiesy with some across the entire nation, and i think working with them directly, there are the unique innovations that are not really, you know, out for the public. Has a path for development. For that, sohis is that all of these companies can work on their projects and eve all the technology and make it possible for these commercial uses. What about safety . What about Traffic Control . Should we be worried about those kinds of things if, indeed, drones are used for commercial purposes . Oh, absolutely. I think you see a lot of videos dropping, andngs it is in a very young stage. We know that none of that is going to be possible, and the real big question for everyone is how to have a network of these things working together in a very safe manner, and this is why nasa is bidding involved, and we are cooperating to build an air Traffic Control system and we arerones, doing very close work with air highway, which is building a protocol, so that rather than having multiple ones around the world, you will have one not havinglmost like multiple internets, but one simple internet that we can all linked to, and i think the faa is going to be working closely with what nasa is working on and what air highway is working on to standardize this. Safety is obviously the paramount, most important thing around this. Standardized drone highways in the air. That could be in our future. The ceo and our bloomberg contributing editor, thank you both. As the world goes mobile, new tools to meet customer demand. We will be back to look at a tech trend, next on bloomberg west. I am emily chang, and this is bloomberg west. Is coming to Small Businesses. Our editor at large. Thenteresting story from newsroom. Yes, cutting edge technology. In work and the giant private sector and the business world, it is fairly interesting, and in the tool your places like invoices. One ceo joins me. Me and told me about invoice to go, and i said, what, invoice to go, but this is a huge business. The product is an application that is generally used to let people may be a two or threeperson business, maybe a plumber or a freelance designer, who wants to be able to have the peace of mind when the work is done, they send the invoice, which is the first step in getting paid. That is the value. If you get your invoices out faster, you get paid faster. This, theu look at , andf a giant business having a look at a lot, what do you see that makes this special or an opportunity not yet realize