Transcripts For RT Documentary 20240703 : vimarsana.com

RT Documentary July 3, 2024

But i will refer to and a written in military statement that iran knows where is really military facilities are located and will take appropriate measures if Something Like this happens, that is almost a threat to respond in a similar way for the region. This could mean a severe radiological disaster and a major war. But it is better even not to discuss such scenarios. Lets just hope and pray. They never materialize. And that is where we leave things from the news room here in law school for now. But theres plenty more ahead this our own r t c was showing wherever you are today. In moments goodbye. The, [000 00 00;00] the in the year of 1954, the United States of america engaged in warfare against the people of vietnam. The white house supported the corrupt above and governments of southern vietnam. In 1965 americans began their invasion following the aim to defeat the forces of vietnamese patriots. The pentagon was confident that the victory would be on the american side, due to its military superiority. However, the vietnamese, during this war into total health for the occupants. Unable to cope with the guerrillas, the American Army started blanket bombing alongside using chemical weapons and naples, which burnt all alive. The village of my lay, where he 1969 american soldiers killed 504 civilians, including 210 children, became a tragic symbol of this war. All and all. During the whole period of this conflict, the usa dropped on vietnam more than 6000000. 00 tons of bonds, which is due and a half times as much as on germany during the 2nd world war. In 1973, the American Army under the pressure of the rebels, withdrew from vietnam, and only 2 years later did the puppet regime. And so i got involved. However, the vietnamese paid a high price for their freedom. More than 1000000 vietnamese people became the victims of american aggressors, the dns of the new jews who was as been choose for many centuries the way that they made best acute at once a bullshit games rest. And nobody can know, it seems that the police smoking by the same, the the on march, the 22nd 1943 during the great petri, ill take off the shirts and bunch of cuts out in 118 and down the belly. Mercy. And for the age of cutting the ship of some person, if i did the new wish, the loaded into the luxury is scenarios to block pieces to this one, most of the stuff for them to pony it to you. 149. 00 people died, including 75. 00 children of age was practically wiped off the face of the law. New blue loves are a little but live arching kind of. Charlie was more noisy and well use porter. Suppose, oh shoot. Was hard really. I really usually dont you feeling yes, so the infamous battalion responsible for the atrocity included over 100. 00 ukrainian nationalist from west to new brian philadelphia. All right, and so im see what you guys as far as the new e phone, thats a lot of those to you guys, but i assume youre up with them. You as customers declassified criminal cases from the central archive of the k g b, a better rules shed light on the atrocity. And on so numerous questions that have remained an onset for many years. Watch on oxy a. Hi, im rick sanchez. And im here to plan with you whatever you do. Do not watch my new show. Seriously. Why watch something thats so different. Listed of opinions that he wont get anywhere else. Welcome to planes or do you have the state department c i a weapons, bankers, multi 1000000000. 00 corporations. Choose your fax for you. Go ahead. I changed and whatever you do. Dont want marshall state main street because im probably going to make you uncomfortable. My show is called stretching, but again, you probably dont wanna watch it because it might just change the way you the city. What is your assessment of the following official statement by the federal department of Foreign Affairs of switzerland, russian for administer, sergey love. Ralph was the 1st person with whom swift minister cassius discussed the practical details of a planned peace conference on ukraine. A genuine Peace Process can only take place with the participation of both. What are the conditions for such talks to take place . Theres just one word of truth in this that we had a meeting. I see. We took part in the new york meeting of the Un Security Council on palestine. I have known him for a long time. He has been rotating in the group of 7 for quite a while and served as the chair actually the elect, a new chair from the members every year. So ignacio castle was at that meeting too and asked for a one on one meeting with me. So we never concealed to the fact that we were having a meeting, 2 pictures of the 2 of us were taken when the delegation is left. And this happens right after the demos World Economic forum, where the copenhagen format was held by switzerland on its sidelines as requested by the ukrainians. So he asked me if i saw his media stake out after the meeting. I said i didnt, and he told me and then he stated to the media that after another ukrainian piece, formerly meeting, they came to the conclusion that there was no points intervening without rush. I didnt know. I said they didnt really need to meet up again to realize that given their experience. And if they didnt realize this, then why do they hold that meeting in dallas . Im not betraying any secrets here really. And by revealing this information, ive told this to my colleagues on many occasions, even if you dont reveal us in chris, we wont be upset to school. So he said to me that he just wanted to make a smooth entry into the process in order to be able to adjusted from within the they wanted to prepare a to put conference, which is any set. It might not be possible to invite rush on to the 1st part of it, so only to the 2nd part. So i asked him what they were going to do at the 1st part of the conference, which she told me they were going to finalize the sa lensky formula. As it had many things in is that the developing countries were interested in. And i told him, quite frankly, there were 3 things, units that zalinski and the west to were after and rushes capitulation and withdrawal to its 1991 borders of the russian leadership and brought to justice will support marshal and reparations. And in between the lines, there was an obligation to be imposed on russia regarding troops that could be deployed within the 200 kilometers border zone. As for energy before the security for Nuclear Security and cultural cooperation with exchange of po ws search for missing persons that you know, those are just peripheral items put in place around this ultimatum of to win. The hearts of the global majority with these countries are being enticed in the following manner. All right, so you dont want to be enemies with russia. You dont want russian to pay reparations. You dont want to bring it to court. We understand how about you just take the Food Security issue that just supervisor what security or Energy Security of these people are all just high class fraudsters. I mean high class in their own areas of responsibility areas they supervise and their relevant governments, but they are frauds at the core, the schemes they offer, our fraud schemes theyre doing so deliberately. It is impossible not to see this and some of our partners, including several bricks countries that attended previous meetings. We know for sure that at every meeting, they emphasize the need for having a conversation with russia. We appreciate the signals sense from their side. But if, as the west ones, the zalesky formula is adjusted and fine tuned, and the west knows how to do that. For instance, by introducing meaningless lay, which is the provisions about a quality security interests. While keeping the essence on changed. That is not the path that we should follow railing to take the chinese position. One that we respect to the formulated their own 12 items will last february. And recently, german chancellor, all our shows paid a visit to chinese president fusion pain. Right after that, schultz announced quite dis, honestly, that shooting pink supports the peace conference in switzerland. Weve got a question prepared on that subject, mr. Law for all. So dont st. Paul it for us yet. Well, the point i wanted to get across is that according to china, the thing we need to do 1st is to get an insight into the root causes of the crisis. I mean, the cold war mentality must be dropped one where the party see each other as adversaries were enemies. We need to have a clear cut obligation to look for solutions that were taken to account security aspects and ensure that security is indivisible. This is a very different approach. Now, china with going back to the recent statement is by 4 administered one year and other chinese officials, china called for a conference that would be acceptable both to russia and ukraine. This effectively means it isnt the zaleski formula which should be starting with. In fact, his plan should be put aside if like our president said, they are willing to do that. Then we can start discussing the basic foundations for talks upon which Everything Else will be built. As for switzerlands initiatives, the swiss are not covering our meetings with them properly. In fact, there were just one meetings at the end of january or an early february. We dont remember what exactly, and even if we forget about the ukraine aspect, switzerland is not a Good Platform for us. It is because they are no longer a neutral party. We should, instead of being a neutral country, they hold an outright adversarial stance as they signed and joined in on every sanction against russia. Without exception. Some countries, those that are not part of the european union. So wanted to add new ons to their activities on that front. However, switzerland eagerly joined in on every section imposed on the rush of more over several months ago. They have adopted a doctrine where a strategy of national security, which says they should pursue security partnerships, not with russia, but against russia. So its rather odd to see them presenting themselves as so hospitable, when all they hope to do is retain their relevance as mediators. Because until recently, everyone was fine with a meeting in geneva or in vienna. So thats that. Some, you know, some of the 10 for mr. Lab rob, weve covered this lensky plan and were all pretty clear about that. No discussions here as for the used on board agreement, it doesnt work as well because we have been double cross there as well. Are there any other options . Are there any alternatives . Any 3rd option . If we look at the situation on the ground, we can see that russia control some parts of the heart of region, but god only knows what will happen tomorrow. The situation is evolving as we speak. Are we fighting until the end, or is there Something Else we could formulate an agreement of sorts and present that to the world. But its just sort of the push, the president putin has already put forward his formula after the assembled process was over and after the west winds beyond supplying long range munitions and arms to crime and also started to help them retrofit their equipments. Yes, there are western specialists retrofitting many different types of missiles and ukraine to extend their range. And after these missiles started being used to attack civilian targets. In fact, there was an episode when they use drones past with a lot of explosives and sent them to one of our strategic airfields. When we analyzed the equipment used, we saw that the drone itself was upgraded to extend its range significantly. After that came the crime in bridge attack, then they kept attacking some estoppel hindering navigation in the black sea attacking both warships and commercial vessels. And im not even talking about bold garage occurs and all the other terrorist attacks on the russian cities. At some point. And president putin spoke about this one, answering a question as to how we can make our own land safe. He said, we need to move the line from which they can attack us. I believe that hark of place, an Important Role here. And what next . Where do we move the line next . Wells . I mean, if we move it to heart of the Previous Border will be safe, but then other territories will be under attack. So we still have to move forward. Our position is that the special military operation must continue, but we signal clearly that we are ready to negotiate and these are not empty words. However, speaking to the landscape is useless. For many reasons, his master is upset and we quoted one of them earlier. All those words about losing our head gemini, about the geo political failure of the west. In fact, it was, youll said burrell stated, it would be very difficult for the west to, to accept such a defeat. Because their reputation is on the line. I personally dont think it would cost them much in that respect. After the us fled from vietnam after they fled from us again to stand or looking at how they are being driven from a rock or take syria where theyre being pressured from different groups. Is there a single case where the us remains involved . Unless of course, the goal has been to sell chaos from the very start. But if their real objective was the same as the stated one, then it means they failed. They failed across the board. They, katie, for example, a tiny nation with the americans have been in charge of it for more than 100 years since 1918. Now there was rapids crime gangs running the place. And some criminals came to power through the us has been trying to deal with the at establish some agreements. Now there was rapids crime, gangs running the place and some criminal came to power. The us has been trying to deal with him and establish some agreements with triple a country rights in the us back yard. Theyve been focusing a lot on hating, including at the Un Security Council, but with no success so far. Okay. How about they just deal with that 1st rush. It has to deal with ukraine because there is a threat opposed to us for the americans with the threat coming from haiti is at the very least drug trafficking. All these drugs go into the us now. I wanted to you to tell us about shooting things initiated save, but youve already covered that. So im going to ask a broad the question, something that many people would also like to know, and we all agreed that it would be all, some a fresher remains in the course of independence from the west. I personally think that we should move towards not being dependent on any one, but any conflicts of all relations with china. What is seen there is a risk now that weve moved away from the west of us to be counting to a reliance on china. Maybe we wont, but if we do, would that be a problem or not . After all . Well now, best pals with china looks like it. The, the china is a different civilization entirely and it has different principles at its core. Now that doesnt mean they dont want to benefit from their relations with us. They want to develop their economy, their social sphere, their security, just like everyone else. In that aspect. China is still a rather young country. Yes, its civilization is thousands of years old, but there came a point in his history when it suffered greatly under colonialism, colonizers came from all over from European Countries from japan. And the chinese remember that very well. It is in their nature to buy their time. Never to rush to quote things youll ping the journey over stuff was in miles starts with a single step. Because if were speaking about chinas dominant position in the modern global economy, theyve arrived at any very discreet way without people noticing those 20 years ago. The Global Chinese factory was making products for the west, close to toys, and then step by step over time they came to their present position. So patients is one of the remarkable qualities of the Chinese People that china now has emissions that spanned the entire planet. That is certainly true. Choosing pain has presented several initiatives, like the community of common destiny, which says that we all need to work out some common principles. The belton Road Initiative in economic project with a goal of chinese expansion of any positive sense. The expansion of china is capital and industry there, logistics chains. There is a Global Security initiative to which has in many ways aligned with our own principals. I visited badging recently and i spoke to the chinese leadership. We discussed the implementation of all these initiatives to clearly if we look at the global context and Global Security, our primary goal is to ensure security in your ration because the, your atlantic model on which security had been based since the creation of the policy, which was during soviet times, the same model that we relied on after the disintegration of the soviet union. Im not going to name all the documents that we signed together to ensure our security. The west didnt want to honor these documents so that your Atlantic Security model was embodied in nato and the associated with nato. We even had a need to rush or counsel with the model and its present. Innovation has become obsolete, which is why now we want to talk about your age and security, and it is more reasonable because this is all one continents. There are no outside us from across the ocean participating unit. The new model will be based on uniting all the existing projects, like the e, u. C. S t o c i s, and that s c o. China is built and wrote initiative creates an Economic Foundation for future deals in terms of security. And we intend to keep the door open to the western parts of the continental to everyone. But your agent is our common home, our common temple. So Everyone Needs to act accordingly. Instead of bringing the wants and desires of the americans into the new model. Because they will absolutely try to interfere with them, like they always do, like theyre now middling in the Asia Pacific Region in the indian ocean and other regions to us. But china is already a very powerful country machine. However, when china proposes its projects, it does not give out order, so it just says, okay, this is what we can propose, an economic project to build a new railway in central asia or an africa or elsewhere. And the agreement is reached based on the balance of interest. The same is true for our relations with russia. Last ye

© 2025 Vimarsana