Transcripts For RT Going 20240703 : vimarsana.com

Transcripts For RT Going 20240703 : vimarsana.com

RT Going July 3, 2024

The divisions within the vast majority of the countries and i dont mean small divisions, you know, political deadlock inability to find leaders who can be effective and move the ball forward. Inability to address serious issues like in the us with the that issue which, you know, 34 trillion and growing and no one has any idea how theyre going to a solve it other than sending yell into china and saying, hey, if you dont buy our bonds, the whole world is going to collapse. So you know, its kind of a will take you down with us approach in those kind of circumstances. Every country has, is, you know, it has to be defensive. The problem is that, you know, the us is trying to play the game that they played with the ussr trying to get countries to put more into the military and disregard their economic rise. And i think would be that far more important for countries like russia and china in particular to pull the resources to move together and try to you know, economically succeed in the end. This is what really matters because you cant pay for guns unless you have an economy that works. Okay, and update on the story weve been following for some time walter level to in the to bowl river located in the ural a city of crude gun have started to go down and cycling after reaching at record highs. As the russian region struggles with ongoing flooding, locals and n g o is, are doing everything they can to help our t producer, my gms id, but shy of reports from this thing. The city of oregon is balancing on the brink of being submerged at the moment level, so forth in the temple re with which the c 2 lies. One is a reason to almost and meet us or whatnot. And the speeds the point of no return, because most of the cities dams are 10 meters high. More than 15000 people have already been evacuated to safety from the flooded areas from the well adjust or the Side Community is just outside the city. Many have left their homes with nothing. They need help. They need basic necessities, such as food, which i mad simple clothes. The government is stepping in, but some groups, such as the elderly or bill since with limited liability, need extra help. And your slight crushing red cross will cease to self care to do what they can. Then well go to the minute as we requested humanitarian aid from the red cross Central Office in advance for actually brought it in and stored. We now have about 200 sets in stock, which we can deliver to people in temporary recommendation centers or other places when you are psychologist, provide assistance to those affected by the floods ive lived including my whole life, of course flooding. Theres nothing new for us, but the level of preparation for this flood was unprecedented. Well have time to move after when everything passes. But now we need to get ourselves together and do everything that is required of us, of massachusetts. So the, we have individual aid kits heads help the victims of the temporary accommodation center. We also have a wheelchair to take liability people out for a walk, help comes from carrying locals and businesses. We would like to say thank you to all the people who donated because now we need very Much Developers putting in much despite all the efforts made crisis disrupt, fly from the c to manual displaced. Infrastructure may collapse and logistics and disorder locals increasingly reliant on paid full and t is providing food, water, and chlorine. But the scale of problems to see, to face is much wide and many are willing to help the municipality. This is the year we prepare backs with santa logged them into cars, tend to place them the other them case of a bridge. His students and volunteers helped to do the job. The task was to prepare the 10000. 00 backs and we have exceeded the target almost done. The city always needs help. People who live nearby also come and help us. We always do this so that the nearest houses are not flooded. Carter says to its good that some people over one time and took care of the animals. Someone else calls for help to to rescue animals. We do them out of the village houses while the roads were still dry. No, its more difficult to do because the water has arrived and we just save them from the water. Every day, more people are being evacuated from flooded areas, but the truth scale of the disaster is via to be full assessed. The man has one to for 40 kilometers long wave, approaching the cd, but the locals are remain calm and hope that with a joint effort they can overcome the biggest challenge they see that has faced in modern history modem in which ive auntie curriculum for next year. In r t, the 1st part of the circle, overall wide ranging interview given to a select number of Russian Media outlets, including the sputnik news agency. Its fully translated and its right back to stay close for that the the i got busy with a 1000 question concerns now tony though swap for us on here, but tell us citizens as well every day and we hear from the west that they will not stop until the rushes to fit it strategically, every day these threats become more terrible small terry fine. Recently the command of these tony and armed forces announced that they were destroyed to the russian cities if something were to happen, or if its the case economists rejoiced over the sides that you green had apparently created a drone bomb side b were in cities, johnson and all the say that if need to knock reached victory on the battlefield, the army costs, and then it will and wesley germany, which means that you will be a dispute from the home west. And its common to just so all of which resembles in a beat me, i dont know what its like. So experienced typically a weapon sort of beat more. And i pray that i know well what, what do you think about the prospects of what is going to happen and youre stuck with respect to register. So i think that all this talk about inflicting defeat on russia and focusing on the existential meaning of this for the future of the west, is not so much a sign of their militant attitude, but of agony and hysteria. You quoted johnson who said, if we allow russian to win, it will be the end of our gemini. This can basically be used by the International Court of justice as confession of guilt, and a case about violating the u. Ns main principles, the solver and the quality of states, and the court has to Pay Attention to that. And there are many statements made in the same tone. If they lose their influence. Russia is going to work with china. Iran, north korea syria to remodel this world. This is not self confidence. On the contrary, and this reflects their understanding. They call it their battle to preserve their gemini. But in fact, were speaking about the formation of a new multi polar world order. And this term room is being used very often. So if somebody is tired of it, we can use other terms equal just to the democratic world order, where everyone will act based on the principle that i mentioned to be ation. What do you and charter talks about the solver and the quality of states . There is that fear of losing his gemini, but there is also the fact that they are very honest. And maybe they do not even notice it. But they make it clear that the us is the master, and they all bands to it. To me go on, a natos deputy secretary general. He is from romania. He said just 10 days ago that the world starts the era of harsh competition between the west on the one hand and russia and china on the other, russia and china and all the rest. Take different actions to undermine American Power and not the power of nato, not the power of the west, but that of america. And that is why, according to this deputy secretary general from romania, the us needs its european allies. This is the meaning of natos existence, presented by one of its main spokesmen and representatives. There are many such statements. But if were speaking about confessions, johnson says that theyre going to lose their head. Gemini, burrell says that there is a blooming garden surrounded by a jungle. You recently said something. Maybe he was disappointed or maybe nervous, but he said, we are not fighting for you. Crane. Were fighting for us. Were fighting against the rush. I mean, not for ukraine, but against russia. News you, there are many such statements. Well, estonia is threatening to destroy a leg by calls with to buried under rocks or Something Like that. It has already been commented on. We cannot seriously talk about this, right . Well, my call is very far from us, tony and when you, well they say they have new drones. This they keep breaking loose, thorns, but the stony allow via and lithuanian are on the forefront of those who threaten us and keeps saying that they will send troops, wage war and so on. Sure, this shows that there was an evolution of nato before, and the decisive rule was given to the united states, of course, but also to europes most important countries. And now states like poland, baltic countries, the czech republic, ball gary, um, under its currents government and others, set the tone. So the major European Countries have to go along shoes. Like for instance, president mack krohn nervously talked about sending french troops. Then other people saying that he was not understood correctly, and after that, he again says that he was understood correctly, which is there is information that military instructors are already working. There may be some other representatives of the European Military or other Security Services in disregard. Our track is very simple. If you didnt want to negotiate, honestly, we presented a treaty on European Security in 2008, 2009. When we proposed one simple thing, for instance and assemble in 1999. You stated that security is indivisible and countries are free to choose their alliances. But they cannot do it if they strengthen their own security at the expense of others. And it was stated directly and all the participants. Our c e president s is up and prime ministers signed the documents at the top level, agreeing that no country or alliance and the always see was going to dominate. That was 1999. Since then, nato has continued with its dominance track, and we said that it was a political declaration with political commitments signed by president s, not some 3rd secretaries from embassies. And we said that if you cannot fulfill your commitments, maybe we could codify if codified this declaration with the same provisions. So we would have a treaty on European Security and that wouldnt be legally binding. But they said no c, i legally binding security guarantees can be obtained on late in the you know, the most. But what about the always c e o you signed it . And so you said that no one is going to dominate, and they answered that. It was just a political statement. Then they said that nato was non expansion, was just an oral statement. The same with the nato, russia founding act. Yes, it was done in writing. They said template, its not a legally binding documents. We were very painful. And so its the president said many times, not for a long time. He forced himself to preserve some kind of trust, hoping that something would happen if the west comes to its senses. The truth and starts in acting in a reasonable and polite way, but none of that has happened in 2008, 2009. They withdrew from the treating, refused to discuss it with us. There was one treated with nato and another one and a context of the o. C. It was a legal agreements and in 2021 to the end of the year after a meeting at the for administrator. President fulton proposed to prepare a treaty that would be a modern treaty based on modern realities. But they refused to even discuss x to i was one of those 2 parts. In that process, there was a delegation that consisted of deputies from different agencies. And then i met with blinking in january 10th or 11th and geneva. He said there can be no obligations as far as natos non expansion is concerned. So well, the americans withdrew from the i n f treaty. You were disappointed even though we withdrew because you had already violated it. I reminded him that when they withdrew, we said okay, if you think that this is the only way out for you, go ahead. But we introduced a moratorium and we propose that the americans introduced their own and more tory and president putins initiative told us explicitly, if you suspect that now risk unders deployed in the region of colon and grad still carrying the mid range missiles that are prohibited by this treaty, you are welcome to come and see and verify, but in return we also want to be able to visit your air defense basis in poland and romania, equipped with the systems whose manufacturer issue Lockheed Martin clearly says that they can be used both for conventional and mid range grounds to air Ballistic Missiles that were banned by this tree. While these air defense bases with this equipment were deployed there while the treaty was still in force. And the us said no, so we made an honest proposal. Please come and check if you suspect us of anything. And we will go and see whether what Lockheed Martin says is true. They refused to do that. I approached mister blinking with our comprehensive proposal. I said you are concerned with the critical situation around ukraine. That is essentially created by your efforts, but he said no, nato was not up for discussion seconds. But regarding that proposal of yours you made before about the mid range missiles, maybe we could look into it and agree, and that these missiles, since theyre not prohibited by the treaty anymore, it could be placed, for instance, in ukraine. And we will be willing to limit the number of such missiles in ukraine or cube. Well, i dont even know what else i need to explain on the subject of why the special military operation became inevitable. Ukraine had a hard core, new nazi regime and power that banned all things. Russians in the west was pumping it with weapons. We considered it a direct threat to our security, our traditions, and our legitimate interests as well. I couldnt make my answer any shorter than that, but you will, you will not actually right while were on the subject of ukraine, the surely a top priority topics. And heres what i would like to ask because they keep saying quite openly that they want to destroy us. They cannot accept our country the way it is to. So i have to hand it to them that they dont try to hide it. Theyve taken all those steps that youve just mentioned, whereas russia and this is what i find hard to understand. We keep saying that we are ready to negotiate. Who are we going to negotiate with . Again, even if hypothetically, we werent going to have negotiations, theyre going to just lie to us the very next day. So one question is why negotiate with people that do not keep their word . And another question, speaking about ukraine, what is our goal there when we speak about negotiations with it, we keep saying that we will achieve all our goals. Those mentioned at the very beginning did not suffocation demilitarization for as long as the same Authority Stay in power or some other authorities of the same type. We will not be able to reach those objectives. Your mark has been included in a top 100 list of most prominent politicians. Wells, the lensky has not, well, it doesnt make much of a difference. So im say you had a mock is still in charge of all these processes. But with these people in power, we cannot accomplish our objectives. Who do we want to see there . What should it be like . Well, i cannot give a short answer to that either. First of all, what are the objectives and why and on what conditions are we ready to have negotiations . Firstly, as our president keeps saying, we always prefer negotiations to fighting a war which and yes, we have had this experience when the premiums realized they went too far. Bombing done basses and using direct methods of genocide against the russians on their own, as they call its territory. And proposed to have negotiations. 2 or 3 weeks after the beginning of the special military operation, we agreed right away. There were several rounds of negotiations which is well known in bell arose then online. After that, we went to assembled where the ukrainians presented their initial proposals. And then after a discussion, these proposals were accepted. They included a commitments of, to cancel the laws that discriminated ethnic minorities 1st of all russians and to cancel their support for the movements glorifying and promoting the nazi ideology that were condemned to by the nuremberg trials. As for the territorial aspect, a couple of days ago, for an Affairs Magazine published the piece is about that negotiation. That is clearly an attempt to try and justify what the west did. Let me explain for an affairs said the us and u. K. Really told zalinski not to sign the deal, but they did it allegedly not because they wanted to continue their proxy work in ukraine and put a strain on the Russian Federation and to eliminate innocent russian civilians. But because they were concerned for that once they saw that the proposal was included to the creation of a Guarantor Group for Ukraine Security that included russia, china, and the west. And the reason for their concern is truly amazing. They said, well, we can sign it. But what of disagreement does not stand for somebody attacks who crane maybe rush it attacks ukraine, and in this case, as guarantors for ukraine, we would have to fight the war with russia. But this isnt something we want to a, you see, this is a very sophisticated logic to figure out. First of all, the suggestion was to have the 5 nations, as well as germany and turkey, a act as guarantors of disagreements. If you happen to be a guarantor state or youre invited to be one and youre thinking if another gear interest age violates that agreements, then i would have to engage in a war against that to guarantor nation. It means they think everyone is just like them violating agreements or something they do easily and they take it for granted that such agreements can be violated by some other party. Just like the agreement of february 2014 was violated. The very next morning, after signs and let us guarantee by france, germany and poland, and they did the same with the mens agreements as was proud legal knowledge by chancellor merkel, president alons and for a strangle himself. And this is an interesting observation. Whenever they calculate well scheming against us and try to anticipate our potential response, we try to think of how we would react while applying their own mentality and logic. But speaking of their mentality, recently a famous us political scientist, a post cold, was voiced, some serious criticism of the west, middle in terms of pragmatism. And some practical aspects mentioning sanctions for one sanctions are normally imposed in order to change someones behavior. And if you really understand how that party will respond, the west however, applies more and more sanctions in a totally mindless manner without giving a thought as to what the outcome might be. And the outcome was obvious from day one, even before the beginning of the special military operation after crimea related sanctions were introduced. And a number of other sanctions, the outcome was obvious. We pulled ourselves together and i hope we can do an even better job. There is more we can do as our president mentioned on multiple occasions. So we pulled ourselves together things and decided that we will not depend on the west in any area where they can try to restrict our development. And i hope in all other areas as well. Now, they probably claim they got rid of the russian gas. But in fact, exports have been growing to many countries, including france and literally push literally recently happily reported that they planned to reduce the share of russian gas and their consumption from 90 percent to 0. Within 3 years german chancellor sholtes did the same, presenting good as a victory to his voters, saying germany has dramatically reduced independence on Russian Energy resources. Animal soon became completely independence, but nobody mentions the price theyre paying for this, or how much their expenses have grown to provide for the population of the population. However, it sees the effects that i showed it was a great mistake. As the pick up was upset and so to miscalculate the russian response because they failed to realize that sanctions can only be efficiency if the sanction party is ready to change his behavior in order for these sanctions to be lifted. And if the sanction party declares outright that its not going to change his behavior, theres no point to proceed with the policy. But that is exactly the policy pursued by our counterparts of just now returning to the question about negotiations, i want to emphasize a very interesting points and they failed to realize that if were place in a situation where we can be strategically defeated, norfolk destroyed, in fact, as a global stakeholder, and theyve failed to realize that this isnt something we wont be scared by. They would have been scared if somebody antagonize them with the same fury, a band and, and capacity still exists in the global economy. However, this only solidified, as i suggest, that they draw conclusions from this listing of history. And if the past 250 years were insufficient for them. As for the talks, we havent discussed it yet. But i hope i will not be criticized for this. Sure. What were the guarantees and stipulated in the symbol agreements and the guarantees were very simple. So we were ready to appease the wish of the ukrainian delegation to make these guarantees on our most serious end. The benchmark of seriousness was article 5 of the washington treating that established the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and it was not reproduced word for word. The wording was different, but very serious security guarantees were outlines. And it was specifically noted that the security guarantees did not cover crimea and dumbass, which effectively meant that they were not to be touched, or otherwise no guarantees would apply. It was also stipulated in this dimensions that ukraine would not hosting any for and military vases, that is as far as the militarization is concerned. So if there were also provisions as let them or pretend mentioned during his meeting with african and delegations last summer in st. Petersburg regarding the number of weapons and personnel deployed. And it was also said that ukraine would not conduct the military drills involving their armed forces of 3rd countries. Except for cases when all the guarantor of states agree, including russia and china. That was it. And we were prepared to commit to that, but it was said, of course, that the negotiations will continue on other aspects. But the hostility is what stop pushing into this. The security guarantees would apply to racism neo nazi and discriminatory laws would be a ball list. And ukraine, and then when all these aspects where it read applause, suddenly, negotiators from care of approached us to say the wish to make some minor amendments. For instance, as for the band to hold military exercises with 3rd forces. Except for the cases, one, all the guarantor states of great interest. They said let us replace this part with ation quotes. When the majority of guarantors agree to this, that was the 1st warning call indicating that either they had been banned from doing this over night, or they decided to mess with us russians a little bit longer. That was just to give you one example. And at the present stage, we have always maintained the restroom, president s and mammals, and Spokes Person to meet your pest golf. And theres no one asks if russia was ready for negotiations. That the president of you, praying with band himself, from having talks with us and clinton said once, when asks this question that he needs to at least abolish that decree as the 1st step. And then we simply dont have any trust in them. This is an important points to emphasize. We tried to make ourselves trust them for a long time, but it was all in vain. And he said, unlike the inseparable process, we would not pause facilities for the period of the talks. The process must continue. And secondly, the realities on the ground have changed drastically in fundamentally and the are to be taken into account by realities on the ground. I mean, not only the position of troops and the line of contacts of light also mean amendments to russias constitution. In a view of guiding for new, but also old regions for of russias original territory. So this is what Everyone Needs to understand. And it is Crystal Clear that they are not only failing to recognize this fact. Theyre not even ready to look for a potential compromises. That is the zalinski formula. Useful to meet him with no alternatives and the list goes on and on with the, the, the the, what is part of the, the employee would post that isnt the defense. You was in that in the word or is it something deeper, more complex might be present good. Lets stop without cases desktop product. As the, [000 00 00;00] the, the stands, the new jews goes as did choose for many centuries the way that they made best acute at once. Bullshit, games oppressed and nobody can know it seems that the bodies spoken by the same the the just didnt do it at the 14, i just dont want to use it. I went back new soon, solving media meetings to search for the settings from. We seemed Pretty Things im really familiar with the norm. Yes, it presents all the to the sale be. The name is the at the was the, the notion to do with it. And its a cute to should get us the book, which is such as to me and i dont, i thought a soup inducing that to, to see about purpose past the on over night is really striking, a residential building in the southern gals in city of rafa. Kills at least 9 people, including 6 children, according to local authorities, and also a head on the program. The, the police to thomas, to me is, are killed during a multi day i, the range in the west, pug happening and made an accelerated construction of this really settlements in the area going home. The us agrees to withdraw our troops from nature after a feeling to renew a security packed with the west african country,