Page 44 - 1505 News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Technical legalistic parsing of a particular federal statute against obstruction of justice, one that says it's a crime to impede a pending proceeding. there's a kourt ruling that says a mere fbi investigation doesn't count as such a proceeding because they're gathering information, not adjudicating anything. also arguments he didn't know necessarily at the time of the conversation that the fbi was actively investigating flynn. so he couldn't have had the intent to interfere with it anyway. all of those arguments are premised on the idea that the relevant law is this one i mentioned, section 1...

Different obstruction statutes that apply to congressional activities. the most obvious would be 1505, but as long as he intended to mislead or omit factual information, he can be charged with a crime, and this is very important, whether or not he was under oath. if he's under oath, it's perjury. if he's not under oath, it still might be section 1001. if there was a statute of the year in the federal criminal code, it would be section 1001, false statements to authorities, including congress, but not necessarily congress. we've already seen others indicted, pleading guilty to the exact same cr...

Mueller have and donald trump's intent and 1505 and also will if he does have enough evidence, will robert mueller indict or will he present that to the congress room impeachment. those are huge questions if things go that far. >> would it be in the president's interest in this tweet is being in a way that he did not mean it for him to clarify and what he meant. >> the best thing to is to let his attorney do it. when your attorney says something, it cannot be held against you and your lips are not moving. smart people when they're under investigation having their attorneys talking. i think the...

Latest updates on this topic from reliable sources.