Page 20 - 1788 News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

This is what the paper is number 76 set about the requirement. this is what mr. hamilton wrote a very long time ago in 1788. the senate could not be tempted by the preference they might feel to another to reject the one proposed because it cannot assure themselves that the person they might wish to be brought forward by any subsequent nomination. they cannot even be certain that a feature nomination would present a candidate in any degree more acceptable to them. to what purpose then to be require the cooperation of the senate? it would be an excellent check upon a spirit of favoritism in the ...

Personal attachment, or from a view to popularity. that was the check and balance advice and consent rules of the game that were established in 1788. when you look at the justice of the supreme court, it has changed dramatically. many of the judges in the super import were confirmed without a hearing. some, without even a recorded vote. i'm not here to say that my party is without fault in the area of judges, we are not. i'm here to say that in novembe. anyway that i think mr. hamilton would be very disappointed in. it's not that i don't understand, i very much do. when my time came for studen...

This is what the federalist papers number 76 said about the requirement of advise and consent. this is what mr. hamilton wrote a time ago, 1788. "the senate could not be tempted by the preference they might feel to another to reject the one proposed because they could not assure themselves that the person they might wish would be brought forward by a second or by any subsequent nomination. they could not even be certain that a future nomination would present a candidate in any degree more acceptable to them. to what purpose then require the cooperation of the senate? it would be an excellent c...

Personal attachment, or from a view to popularity." that was the check and balance advise and consent rules of the game that was established in 1788. when you look at the justice of the supreme court it's changed dramatically. many were confirmed without a hearing. some without even a recorded vote. m notere to say that my party is without fault in the area of judges. i'm here to say that on 2013, november 2013, the game changed, in a way that i think mr. hamilton would be very disappointed in. and it's not that i don't understand, i very much do, when my time came for sotomayor and kagan to a...

Later when we ratified the constitution in 1788, that's how we got a president. after that, we needed to hold an election to pick a president for e first time. so ratified 1788. 1789 was the first presidential election in the united states. wasn't a particularly event full one. there was only one guy running. george washington stood for president in that first presidential election in 1789. nobody ran against him. he got all the electoral votes. then in 1792 it was time for our second presidential election. again, nobody ran against george washington. would you? there were 132 votes vast in th...