Page 3 - 445 2 News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Which set the stage for democrats to pull an epic route of republicans in those 1974 anymore midterm elections. in the house that year, democrats won the biggest majority in a decade. the democratic margin of victory was even more apparent in the popular vote. in 1974, democrats beat republicans by more than 8.7 million votes. a record that has stood for 44 years. but is now in danger of being shattered because as the votes continue to roll in, more than two weeks after election day, democrats are now ahead of republicans by more than 8.6 million votes. just a hair behind that watergate-era de...

Control of the justice department. jeff sessions. never took control of the justice department. and it's sort of an incredible thing. ed: president trump right there clashing again with the attorney general jeff sessions over the direction of the justice department and the attorney general fired back saying the department simply will not be influenced by politics. drive griff county attorney general continue to serve justice if he doesn't have the president's cfd? joining us to discuss it right now, former deputy director of public affairs for the doj ian pryor. good morning, thank you for joi...

Himself under u.s. code of federal regulations 28 cfr 45.2 because of an ongoing criminal investigation. however, at thest time of sessions' recusal, there was no russia collusion criminal investigation. it was a counterintelligence inquiry. in fact, the criminal investigation only started after sessions' recusal upon the appointment of the special counsel robert mueller. here we are today. now robert mueller is even reportedly investigating now, he's desperate, he's panicking, he knows this is blowing up, a meeting that took place between trump and sessions, that took place shortly after the ...

I hear what you're saying and you didn't do anything wrong there. i want to talk to you about your recusal from the russian case. you cited cfr 445.2 saying you were involved with the campaign that triggered recusal. however, that regulation only applies to criminal xruprosecuts or investigations. when you recused yourself, that was a counterintelligence investigation, not a criminal investigation, so why did you cite that regulation to recuse from a counterintelligence investigation when its only applicability is for an intelligence investigation? >> i'm not sure that that was expressed to me...

Ari fleischer from judicial watch, tom fitton, i don't even think this is the most egregious side of this. i don't like that he hired hillary clinton's attorney who worked under the clinton foundation, will put up all the donors, political donations from mueller's team that went to democrats, as we put that up on the screen. you have been able to identify a very specific statutes and laws as you explain them, 45.2 disqualification statute, why don't we put them up on the screen and you can explain them in what they mean? >> it means that if you have a personal relationship with somebody substa...