Page 7 - 5th Decision News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Life. making a decision based solely on race or disability certainly is a discriminatory practice. no decision in terms of whether or not to have a child should be pea based on that solely. >> that confuses me. as you know there are lots of terminations of pregnancies based on the fact that there are severe abnormalities of a fetus. why would you take away the choice from a family? >> it's not a matter of taking away the choice. it's a matter of making the decision solely on the basis of not wanting a child because the child doesn't have a particular characteristic. we have certainly examples ...

Court's ruling. but the justices also allowed part of the law that requires clinics to bury or cremate fetal remains. joining us to talk about it is curtis hill of indiana. >> thank you for having me. >> it sounds like a mixed decision. what i want to focus on is the first part we just described. indiana had tried to block women from getting abortions if it were based on a disability. i'm curious. why would you want a family to have to have a child with a severe disability? >> well, the issue that the general assembly faced was not with regard to the question you posed. it's the question of th...

A chromosome defect. that child will have so many problems and will most likely not live past their 1st birthday. why would lawmakers force parents to bring that child to fruition? >> the law doesn't address issues with respect to severe abnormalities that would make a child unviable. that's not the point of this particular statute. >> it does cover those. >> -- decisions based on -- this statute bases decisions on discriminatory practices. simply making a decision to have an abortion based upon a characteristic that's unnecessary. >> lot os s of families make th decision. hold on a second. lo...

Could take a serious examinatio of criminal investigationna int the conduct of hillary clinton and her foundationfo. not to mention, re-examining th decision to absolve her under espionage charges in the e-mail scandal.l. >> great work. now, this is beginning to blow wide open. there is a lot more coming. we come back, we told you this carry proposals in the green ne deal, everything is free. directly ahead we will set the record straight. and we have a hollywood villain of the day. can't even make this a up is so insane. s california phones offers free specialized phones... like cordless phon...

Actions violated the free exercise clause. the opinion as i just stated was written by justice kennedy. justices ginsberg and -- it's a 5-year-old legal battle. we've been following it for quite some time. >> bill: the customers were carly craig and david mullens and represented, many thought, a bit of a test between the constitution's guarantees to free speech and religion that prohibited discrimination against the lgbt community. phillips was fighting for the rights of a creative artist to choose what they're able to sell based on how they make that decision. craig and mullens were fighting ...